That sounds like swapping out one can of worms (power) for a whole other can of worms (plumbing and cooling).
US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
- Thread starter tphuang
- Start date
That sounds like swapping out one can of worms (power) for a whole other can of worms (plumbing and cooling).
It is a big problem in space where the near vacuum condition means that you can only remove heat via radiation. You will need to dump heat through very large radiators.
This is actually approaching Indian military parade visuals. Just need a spinning guy with binoculars on top
The mysterious container based MRL system we saw in .
Inspired by the naming of another very successful MRL, I'd like to call it Nein Mobility Artillery Rocket System, so NIMAS.
Or maybe No Mobility Strategic Launcher i.e. NMSL idk.
P.S. Can someone do the world a favor and shotdown that Marine one, pls?
Inspired by the naming of another very successful MRL, I'd like to call it Nein Mobility Artillery Rocket System, so NIMAS.
Or maybe No Mobility Strategic Launcher i.e. NMSL idk.
P.S. Can someone do the world a favor and shotdown that Marine one, pls?
Interestingly, "NMSL" is a classic profanity in Chinese.
yeah that's my point lmao
It is really difficult to get rid of waste heat in the vacuum of space.
Case and point. The ISS generates between 84-120kW of electrical energy routinely, waste heat had to be dissipated with multiple radiators similar in size to the massive solar panels. A megawatt class laser in space will have heat problems several orders of magnitude beyond what currently exists.
Have they lost their god damn mind???
So if a company developing DEW technology claims that their IP can be scaled to engage cruise and ballistic missiles, and is "platform agnostic" (so long as the mission platform can support their claimed power requirements), then should they be assumed to be a total scam, to have failed to add an *asterisk to exclude space based platforms, or would such IP be technically feasible for a DEW that isn't a chemical laser?