US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
France also has a military base in UAE and we are seeing more and more French operations in the Gulf, which is interesting

Thier plans for a second carrier have been indefinitely shelved due to economic reason which means these Mistral Class LHD will really be the flat tops that will be doing much of the French over seas power projection
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Lockheed Martin Successfully Completes LRASM Vertical Launch System Tests
wGquOku.jpg

Lockheed Martin successfully completed MK 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS) “push-through” testing of a simulated Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM). Four consecutive tests verified that the simulated LRASM can break or “push through” the MK 41 canister’s forward cover without causing damage to the composite structure, air data probe or coatings of the missile.

The testing was part of a Lockheed Martin-funded shipboard integration effort to prove LRASM can successfully function as an Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare (OASuW) weapon. The push-through testing is an important risk reduction milestone critical to demonstrating LRASM’s surface launch capability.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Three Japanese warships arrived in San Diego Bay on Friday, where they'll conduct community outreach before participating in the multilateral amphibious exercise Dawn Blitz from June 11-18, the US Navy says.

The vessels include the landing ship tank JS Shimokita, the destroyer JS Atago, and helicopter destroyer JS Hyuga. The ships are part of the Japanese Self-Defense Force. The JSDF, the successor to the Imperial Japanese Navy, has 134 active ships, just under half the number operated by the U.S. Navy.

The Navy described Dawn Blitz as a "scenario-driven exercise that will test participants in the planning and execution of amphibious operations in a series of live training events to improve naval amphibious core competencies. It is designed to train the Navy and Marine Corps in operations expected of an amphibious exercise and will test staffs in the planning and execution of amphibious operations."

sorry..no photos. maybe later.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
The House armed services committee today voted voted on some amendments to the Fy14 budget. Two are big on the army I will post stories on them saturday. But one would affect the army camoflage program and force all the services save Socom into a single camoflage family. The other forces the Army to finish the evaluation of possible replacements for the M4
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
The House armed services committee today voted voted on some amendments to the Fy14 budget. Two are big on the army I will post stories on them saturday. But one would affect the army camoflage program and force all the services save Socom into a single camoflage family. The other forces the Army to finish the evaluation of possible replacements for the M4

Man! they have been wanting to replace the M-16/M4 since the 1980's with all sort of fancy looking 'gadgets' and yet here we are 30 years later, and the AR chassis is still the military standard. I guess they could replace it with the HK 416 but that is also based on the AR platform though the mechanism is a lil bit different.

There is really no single battlefield rifle out there at this point that is so far above the M4 that it warrants replacement. There are probably a dozen rifles out there that is just as good.. maybe even a lil tad better but not good enough to make it worthwhile. Some are either too expensive, too gimmicky, to prone to failure but most just do not offer that much better performance etc that a replacement can be justified.

Personally I think we have pretty much reach the apex of firearms. Until there is some serious technology breakthrough in sending a piece of metal from point A to B most improvements you see will come in the form of materials, optical sights and perhaps the projectiles themselves (i.e smart bullets). Wake me up when someone makes a rail gun rifle or a laser blaster that isn't the size of a pickup truck.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Actually the first attempt dates to the 1970s project SALVO. Only part of that that lasted was the grenade launcher on one prototype it became the M203
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
House Blocks Cancelation of Carbine Competition
Jun 06, 2013
Military.com| by Matthew Cox
2 Add a Comment

The House Armed Services Committee passed a budget amendment Thursday aimed at preventing the Army from canceling its improved carbine competition without conducting the final, soldier evaluation phase.
It's been five years since Army leaders announced the plan to search for a replacement for the M4 Carbine, originally made by Colt Defense LLC. Now program officials are in the process of canceling the competition before it's completed and reprogramming the $49.6 million requested in the proposed fiscal 2014 budget to buy 30,000 new Individual Carbines, Military.com reported May 2.
Army weapons officials recently completed Phase II of the competition where testers fired hundreds of thousands of rounds through carbines submitted by gun makers such as Heckler & Koch, FNH-USA, Remington Defense, Adcor Defense Inc. and Colt Defense LLC, the original maker of the M4 carbine.

The service's original plan was to award three contracts to three gun makers for the final phase of the competition, which would involve soldiers firing nearly 800,000 rounds in three separate user evaluations before choosing a winning carbine.
Secretary of the Army John McHugh is considering canceling the competition early and finding other uses for what amounts to more than $300 million the service budgeted for new carbines through 2018.
The HASC decided Thursday it wants the Army to finish the carbine effort it has already funneled $20 million into before making a final decision.
Committee members voted unanimously in the wee morning hours of June 6 to support the amendment to the fiscal 2014 National Defense Authorization ACT sponsored by Rep. Loretta Sanchez, ranking member of the House Armed Services Tactical Air and Land Forces subcommittee.
The amendment, if passed into law, prevents McHugh from canceling the IC competition before the Army completes the Phase III user-evaluation portion, conducts a business case analysis, and reports back to congressional defense committees with the effort's findings, according to the amendments official language.
The amendment still has to pass through the Senate and would not take effect until Oct. 1 -- the beginning of fiscal 2014 -- so the Army has a little less than four months to cancel the IC program without violating a congressional directive.
It's unclear when or if the Army will address the issue.
"We don't comment on pending legislation, but we do look forward to the passage of the NDAA for FY14," Army spokesman Matthew Bourke said Thursday.
The carbine competition is not the only effort the Army has launched to improve the soldier's basic individual weapon. The service recently decided to replace the standard M4 with the M4A1, as a result of its M4 Product Improvement Program.
The M4A1 is the special operations version of the weapon that's been in use for just over a decade. It features a heavier barrel and a full-auto trigger. The Army's decision to dump the current three-round burst trigger will give shooters a more consistent trigger pull and lead to better accuracy, weapons officials maintain.
The Army has budgeted $21.2 million to buy 12,000 M4A1s in the proposed fiscal 2014 budget.
The Army's effort to replace the M4 has not been without scrutiny. The Pentagon's Inspector General recently announced it was auditing the improved-carbine effort. In March 19 testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the watchdog group said there were concerns that "DoD may not have an established need for this weapon nor developed performance requirements ... such as accuracy, reliability, and lethality," according to testimony.
Army officials and program experts were quick to point out, however, that the IG testimony contains misunderstandings about basic facts of the carbine-improvement effort. The Army established its requirements for the improved carbine effort three years ago.
The requirements document calls for a weapon that's almost twice as accurate as the current M4.
This is a topic Project Manager Soldier Weapons plans to explore separately when it hosts its first Small Arms Fire Control Industry Day on June 27 at Picatinny Arsenal, N.J., "to see just how far fire control technology has come, and how far it has to go before landing in the hands of Soldiers," according to a June 5 announcement on Program Executive Office Soldier's website.
"Fire control systems provide a way of realizing the full potential of our small arms weapon systems," said Col. Scott C. Armstrong, Project Manager Soldier Weapons. "These systems provide soldiers with a ballistic solution to help them acquire and engage targets with precision."
The Entries in that competition.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
HK416A5

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Colt enhanced M4

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Barretta ARX160

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Remington ACR IC

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
FNAC
All of them Are multi caliber weapons, All use piston systems, Only the Colt and HK lack a folding stock option. Two are total Us products the Colt and Remington, FNAC, ACR and ARX160 have vice less barrel change. All have MILSTD 1913 Rail systems All USe STANAG Magazines

Now the other Story.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In Particular
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It both repeals and expands a FY2010 requirement directing the DOD to create a Optional Joint ground combat uniform The Army as part of that created the Phase III Camouflage evaluation That took offerings from around the globe Fear Gear from Hong Kong China, Roggenwolf from Australia, Pencott from The UK, as well as Offerings from the US and Canada. In the End at the phase IV selection four stood as the remainder one of those four will be selected as either the Army's new camo or if the Enyart Amendment goes Through as law the likely all Us service Camo uniform for at least the next decade.

those Four?
Brookwood companys
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Crye Precision Who is keeping there's hush hush but is likely based on Multicam.

Hyperstealth/ADS US4 Aces
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Kryptec L.E.A.F.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Early in phase IV US government patterns like Marpat and AOR bit the dust. to learn why is suggest reading this.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Man! they have been wanting to replace the M-16/M4 since the 1980's with all sort of fancy looking 'gadgets' and yet here we are 30 years later, and the AR chassis is still the military standard. I guess they could replace it with the HK 416 but that is also based on the AR platform though the mechanism is a lil bit different.

There is really no single battlefield rifle out there at this point that is so far above the M4 that it warrants replacement. There are probably a dozen rifles out there that is just as good.. maybe even a lil tad better but not good enough to make it worthwhile. Some are either too expensive, too gimmicky, to prone to failure but most just do not offer that much better performance etc that a replacement can be justified.

Personally I think we have pretty much reach the apex of firearms. Until there is some serious technology breakthrough in sending a piece of metal from point A to B most improvements you see will come in the form of materials, optical sights and perhaps the projectiles themselves (i.e smart bullets). Wake me up when someone makes a rail gun rifle or a laser blaster that isn't the size of a pickup truck.

Your quite right Kwai, not one of those weapons offers any appreciable advantage over the M-4, in fact I just purchased a new Rock River Arms Predator Pursuit with an 18 inch middie tube and a clean stainless medium weight barrel. It is so simple its gorgeous, like the Mauser 98 it is timeless and capable, it points like my double barrel Merkle shotgun so whats not to love. While I haven't fired it, I would bet good money that it will run perfectly and shoot inside an 1" at 100yds, its the Winchester 30-30 carbine of the last century. You can buy parts anywhere, it so good that everyone makes one??? really.... all the wanna-be's are overly complex and ugly. All weapons have issues we work around, the truly great weapons have an advantageous ergonomic practicality and an aesthetic appeal that is nearly uninversal, why it makes good sence to leave well enough alone! brat

Unlike some, I put my own money where my mouth is!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Well some of us happen to live in hypicitical states that ban semi auto rifles hound tobacco smokers well allowing pot smokers a protected status
 
Top