US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
How much does it cost?

No word on that yet, but given its features and so far limited production it will be expensive. This isn't a commercial FPV modified to carry an RPG or Grenade, but a purpose built system using AI (likely on nVidia hardware) to operate in GPS denied environments.

Just look at the apparent quality of construction and features it offers! This is a smart weapon quadcopter so it shouldn't be compared against commercial drones modified for FPV usage.
 

RobertC

Junior Member
Registered Member
Found what I expected to find: Anduril and Palantir working together.

But first Anduril vs Skydio. In the Miscellaneous topic HereToSeePics and I hypothesized that Skydio faced annihilation due to Chinese sanctions imposed today. While I think there will be some difficult times ahead for Skydio I believe the observation-oriented domestic market will save it, with Federal help, leaving the encryption-secured weapons-enabled military market to others such as Anduril and Replicator/CCA.

Which brings me back to Anduril and Palantir. In every blurb about Anduril there was always a reference to its Lattice software
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


So close to Palantir strengths so without really trying hard I found the Army partnership
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Anduril Industries announced today that the company is part of the team selected by the Army to develop and manufacture the Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node (TITAN) ground station system, the Army’s next-generation deep-sensing capability. The industry-defining team, led by Palantir Technologies, is made up of the nation’s leading traditional and non-traditional contractors. Under the partnership, Anduril will spearhead hardware design, development, and scaled manufacturing across 10 TITAN vehicles.
And following that thread further was Lattice, Bolt, et al. I expect we'll be reading more about this synergistic Anduril-Palantir partnership in the future.
 

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
Found what I expected to find: Anduril and Palantir working together.

But first Anduril vs Skydio. In the Miscellaneous topic HereToSeePics and I hypothesized that Skydio faced annihilation due to Chinese sanctions imposed today. While I think there will be some difficult times ahead for Skydio I believe the observation-oriented domestic market will save it, with Federal help, leaving the encryption-secured weapons-enabled military market to others such as Anduril and Replicator/CCA.

The thing I remember about Skydio when they were first announced was their impressive onboard compute for their vision system. That seemed to be what separated them from the other competitors. Do they still have an advantage in that field?
 

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
According to this Twitter user it looks like Blue Halo will unveil another Stryker variant armed with a laser weapon system during the annual Association of the United States Army 2024 conference (AUSA) which starts on October 14th.


I believe this is the Stryker being alluded to in the above Tweet.


More info can be found in a piece by The War Zone.

new-laser-counter-drone-stryker-unveiled.jpg


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


A new counter-drone focused variant of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
armed with a laser directed energy weapon,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a 30mm automatic cannon, radars and other sensors has broken cover.
 

RobertC

Junior Member
Registered Member
The navalists over at CDR Salamander state the obvious
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

With only seven [THAAD] batteries available and the world generally in disarray, the only reason I can think of that would justify this move [of a THAAD battery into Israel and 100 Army troops to operate it] is simply that the US Navy just can’t bring enough DDG with SM-3 off Israel to do the job. We’ve shot what we’ve got…at least for a bit. What few we have are located elsewhere with missions of their own.
The article provides a readable summary of the SM-3 variants, their capabilities and their procurement quantities. But the bottom line hasn't changed
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Yeah folks get excited about new toys nearby
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
but they're just feel-good for the host nation. As the Russian SMO and now the Middle East free-for-all have proven, success is about weapons in the hands of soldiers. The US and EU didn't stock enough and peace-dividended their ability to produce more in quantity. The outcomes are matching the models.
 

RobertC

Junior Member
Registered Member
The US has tested new reloading mechanism [TRAM] for VLS cells of warships while underway at sea.
As I said in a previous post, this is a Pt Hueneme hobby project to demonstrate something-is-being-done. TWZ sums it up
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as follows:
...But the volume of fire that could occur in such a [Pacific] conflict could quickly leave America’s most powerful warships without certain types of missiles in their VLS cells. This is especially concerning when it comes to weapons that are critical to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Ports capable of VLS resupply could be thousands of miles away from patrol areas and they too could be at risk of attack. On top of this, the U.S. Navy is finding it very challenging to meet its surface combatant hull goals of the future. Each ship that is operational at the time of the conflict will be very valuable and keeping them on scene longer will be critical to achieving overall military objectives. TRAM is supposed to go a long way in helping with these issues, although having enough ships to execute underway replenishment in such a huge theater, even with potential combat losses,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Once again, run the numbers. Not enough ships (combatant and underway replenishment). Not enough missiles (maybe SM-2, certainly SM-3). Still RDTE pocket-change money, no SCN/OPN/OMN money. TWZ in May this year:
According to figures provided by the Navy, In [the last] Fiscal Year 2023, the service allocated $3.9 million in Research, Test, Development & Evaluation (RDT&E) funds for what’s known as the modular
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
with another $12.4 million set aside for [this] Fiscal Year 2024. It is unclear whether any funds have been requested for [next] Fiscal Year 2025.
There's isn't even a POM:
[SecNav] Del Toro said [in April this year], “The at-sea demonstration will take place later this year — an unheard-of pace for a capability with such revolutionary strategic potential. If we had waited to Program Objective Memorandum, or POM, for it, we wouldn’t see it demonstrated for at least another two or three years. Instead, we’re on track to begin fielding it in two or three years.” [sotto voce when I've left for private industry]
 

E100

Junior Member
Registered Member
Anduril has unveiled their Bolt and Bolt-M quadcopter man packable autonomous air vehicles.

The devices claim to be AI enabled with gross weight of ~13.5 lbs. The device takes five minutes to set-up from unpack, and contains 40 mins of flight time over 20km. Flight is handled via waypoints or direct tracking of objects and is capable of tracking objects even through obstacles.

Device flight system is fully autonomous and does not use FPV drone flight.

The system seems to have an Xbox like controller interface using the nearly the same button layout as a traditional Xbox controller combined with a touch screen in the centre.

Weight of explosive device is around 3lbs so suited for small vehicles and infantry.

Honestly, I'm underwhelmed. Pretty much any bog standard consumer drone from DJI or Autel, etc come with these features (e.g. Target tracking, waypoints, etc). Secondly, why would you want to turn your extremely useful recon drone into a kamikaze drone? It's slower, less powerful, more expensive and your squad loses valuable back-up local ISR. To put it simply Mavic like drones are more useful working and intact then turning them into slightly better hand grenades. There is a reason why both the RF and AFU tend to split these drone roles apart and don't try to mix and match them. To me this seems more like some Silicon Valley techbro product that was thrown into the market without much research nor feedback.

And if you really want to explode something using ISR drones you may as well use droppable munitions, similar fire power, more uses and you get to keep the drone afterwards. Also since this is a recon drone that’s going to carried around in backpacks, etc, having explosives hidden inside it alongside the lithium batteries seems a bit risky. What happens if the drone gets damaged out in the field and the batteries and/or explosives go off?

If you removed the silly explosive feature and replaced it with a more useful and versatile payload propping feature it would be a lot better. Nothing special but a more useful system overall. On the other hand, the build quality is leagues better than S*ydio, not that is anything worth bragging about.
 

gpt

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

France and Germany have officially joined Operation Olympic Defender, a U.S.-led multinational initiative aimed at strengthening space defense and deterring aggression in the space domain. As reported by U.S. Space Command, this expansion marks a significant development in international cooperation for space security, bringing advanced capabilities and deepening military space ties between Europe and the United States.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

SAN DIEGO—The U.S. Navy achieved a breakthrough in combat readiness today as it successfully demonstrated the Transferrable Reload At-sea Method (TRAM) on an underway warship in open ocean for the first time.

Sailors aboard the Ticonderoga-class cruiser USS Chosin (CG 65) used the hydraulically-powered TRAM device to load an empty missile canister into the ship’s MK 41 vertical launching system (VLS) while off the coast of San Diego on Oct. 11.

The successful demonstration marks a critical step in the capability to rearm warships at sea—a top priority outlined by Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro.

“Today, we proved just how game-changing TRAM truly is—and what a powerful deterrent it will be to our competitors,” said Del Toro, who witnessed the demonstration. “This demonstration marks a key milestone on the path to perfecting this capability and fielding it for sustained operations at sea.”

“This was an outstanding effort by the sailors and civilians involved in demonstrating this game-changing capability for the Navy,” said Capt. James “Mike” Williams, commanding officer of Chosin.

The groundbreaking at-sea test follows a successful land-based demonstration in July at Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division (NSWC PHD) in California.

Engineers at NSWC PHD developed the TRAM prototype as a way to rearm warships during the underway replenishment (UNREP) process—when a supply ship connects to a combatant at sea to transfer vital material such as fuel and food.

“The combatant can stay near the fight to be rearmed, refueled and resupplied all at the same time,” said Rich Hadley, UNREP division manager at NSWC PHD. “As Capt. Arleigh Burke said, ‘All time spent in replenishing was time lost in combat.’ TRAM improves operational effectiveness by reducing the amount of time the warfighter must spend away from the fight replenishing.”

For the at-sea demonstration, Chosin connected to USNS Washington Chambers (T-AKE 11), a Military Sealift Command dry cargo and ammunition ship, which transferred the missile canister across cables to the cruiser. The sailors then used TRAM to move the missile canister along rails attached to the cruiser’s VLS modules, tilt it into a vertical position, and lower it into a VLS cell with TRAM’s built-in cable and pulley system.

“Deploying TRAM into the Military Sealift Command logistics fleet,” said Tim Barnard, director of the NAVSEA technology office (05T), “would enable combatants to remain in theater while reloading their VLS missile launchers instead of having to travel long distances to a port, greatly expanding the volume and tempo of long-range fires—and the U.S. Navy’s advantage over adversaries.”

MK 41 VLS provides rapid-fire missile launch capability for the U.S. Navy’s destroyers, cruisers and future Constellation-class frigates.

Del Toro said the Navy is on track to begin fielding TRAM in two to three years.????
 
Top