Su-35 ended up being pretty weak for its potential though...The old F-15s are rotting and there are no more F-22s. The F-35 just does not cut it either.
And Americans used to laugh about Russia having programs like the Su-35.
Old F-15s have so many airframe aging issues and F-22/F-35 are hangar queen. Having fighters that can fly is way more important than having fighters that are G limited for structural reasons, grounded or unavailable.The old F-15s are rotting and there are no more F-22s. The F-35 just does not cut it either.
And Americans used to laugh about Russia having programs like the Su-35.
So it is winding down before it even starts. I think that's called vaporware. The whole US hypersonic effort thus far has been pretty pathetic.
Relying on surveillance, the kill chain need to be short and outside the range of any hacker. AI will help but you need insane coverage from interception missiles platform too, not just from satellites.
The narrative has shifted to: the US doesn't really need hypersonic missiles. We can use our superior C4ISR capabilities to track and intercept them.
how do you know? just because it can destroy a air defense system does not mean it has to do it right away.Su-35 ended up being pretty weak for its potential though...
Su-35 ended up being pretty weak for its potential though...
Maybe they will test it more but behind the humiliation of it failing in the public eyes.More vaporware. The US solid rocket production base is in a pretty bad state currently.