Is this real? Or a deliberate attempt to misinform their potential adversaries into actually believing in this supposed sorry readiness state of a ver important strategic asset in such an important time for the US in its attempt to maintain their global dominance in all domain. I just really find it difficult to accept that American military is this shit despite the many public pronouncements of China competition and the need to ramp up their forces at all levels.Only about half of the F-35 fighter jets are considered mission-capable, well below the target of 65%
Solid Snack (comment user)
I don't believe them in the least. I think their definition of "mission-ready" includes fighters in the queue for extremely minor maintenance. Nothing that would prohibit them from flying and fighting. I think this is a CIA PsyOp campaign to trick China into initiating military hostilities.Is this real? Or a deliberate attempt to misinform their potential adversaries into actually believing in this supposed sorry readiness state of a ver important strategic asset in such an important time for the US in its attempt to maintain their global dominance in all domain. I just really find it difficult to accept that American military is this shit despite the many public pronouncements of China competition and the need to ramp up their forces at all levels.
That's a F-35 program, not an engine-specific, problem. Its not the engine's fault that:
"The original program engine specification allocated 15 kW [kilowatts] of bleed air extraction to support system cooling requirements, and the F135 engine was designed, tested, and qualified to this specification with a level of margin available for future growth," Schmidt wrote.
"During the final stages of initial aircraft development, air vehicle cooling requirements grew to exceed planned bleed air extraction."
"To provide the necessary bleed air, the engine is required to run hotter, and the program is realizing the effects of this through an increase in operating temperature, and a decrease in engine life, which is driving earlier depot inductions and an increase in lifecycle cost," the written testimony adds.
This seems like it is going to be an impressive weapon once deployed! ~2,800 km + in range with two missiles per launcher is quite the punch.
This seems like it is going to be an impressive weapon once deployed! ~2,800 km + in range with two missiles per launcher is quite the punch.
Is this real? Or a deliberate attempt to misinform their potential adversaries into actually believing in this supposed sorry readiness state of a ver important strategic asset in such an important time for the US in its attempt to maintain their global dominance in all domain. I just really find it difficult to accept that American military is this shit despite the many public pronouncements of China competition and the need to ramp up their forces at all levels.