US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

USAF Testing ‘Mutant’ Missiles That Twist In Mid-Air To Hit Their Targets​

air-force-mutant-missiles.jpg
 

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
The fearmongering was indeed fascinating.


dot dot dot


Imagine if a belligerent United States declared the Taiwan Straits to be territorial wat... Oh whoops. Anyway, it is highly unlikely that any modern state would harass international shipping. If anything, owning the Arctic Ocean would give Russia greater incentive to make sure that there isn't any piracy.



I would like to sink the US Navy.

Jokes aside, I do think the article is largely correct, but I do have an issue with a couple points.



I mean, compared to China we are behind, but honestly... our industrial base is really not that bad. I don't know why people automatically think that, we need to put things into perspective. We still build lots of things, especially military ships and jets. What we need, is a much better approach to civilian-military industrial cooperation and simple project planning. The Zumwalt and LCS didn't fail because our shipyards were horrible.

Similarly, the article also talks about how mergers are apparently really bad. That's not really the case though. Mergers allowed for economies of scale on big projects. What we need to do, is to reduce barriers to entry and to focus more on rewarding innovators rather than those with cozy political connections.
A lot of the US publications that call for more naval spending are almost quackery.

Here is a teardown of a past one

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
The fearmongering was indeed fascinating.


dot dot dot


Imagine if a belligerent United States declared the Taiwan Straits to be territorial wat... Oh whoops. Anyway, it is highly unlikely that any modern state would harass international shipping. If anything, owning the Arctic Ocean would give Russia greater incentive to make sure that there isn't any piracy.



I would like to sink the US Navy.

Jokes aside, I do think the article is largely correct, but I do have an issue with a couple points.



I mean, compared to China we are behind, but honestly... our industrial base is really not that bad. I don't know why people automatically think that, we need to put things into perspective. We still build lots of things, especially military ships and jets. What we need, is a much better approach to civilian-military industrial cooperation and simple project planning. The Zumwalt and LCS didn't fail because our shipyards were horrible.

Similarly, the article also talks about how mergers are apparently really bad. That's not really the case though. Mergers allowed for economies of scale on big projects. What we need to do, is to reduce barriers to entry and to focus more on rewarding innovators rather than those with cozy political connections.

I don't understand the reticence with collaborating with South Koreans on surface combatants.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
I don't understand the reticence with collaborating with South Koreans on surface combatants.
It would be a good move. If they dont now SK might just lose it.

Also light weight tank from Japan. A scaled down Type 10 tank would be really good MPF.

US could also borrow some ship borne anti ship missile tech from Japan.

Better yet, pull a tsmc and bring these company to USA.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Given the flight date has been pushed back, the demonstration unit was likely completely non-functional. Purely for media appearances. Now they need more money to actually begin the real work.
Yeah probably run out of money like always.

It will cost 400% more, they will build 4 time less than needed and they will have all his capacity if they are lucky in 15 years.
 
Top