US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
I wish the article would describe what kind of "inappropriate behavior" that got him dismissed.

The USN is never going to tell you but..Usually the inappropriate conduct is a sexual/romantic relationship with a person in his/her command. Normally junior to said CO. Sometimes it's alcohol related.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
The USN is never going to tell you but..Usually the inappropriate conduct is a sexual/romantic relationship with a person in his/her command. Normally junior to said CO. Sometimes it's alcohol related.

Doh! That's fraternization with an officer there.
 

paintgun

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


What that looks like is this (PDF): The Army drops to 490,000 soldiers from its current 565,000, while the Marines’ endstrength slides from 202,000 to 182,000. Program-wise, the Air Force is scheduled to lose six fighter squadrons, its Global Hawk Block 30, and a whopping 130 aging transport aircraft. The Navy surprisingly, (given all the talk of the “strategic pivot” toward the Pacific) loses eight Joint High Speed Vessels, two Littoral Combat Ships, one Virginia-class submarine and seven aging cruisers. It will also see the slippage of a large deck amphibious ship (LHA) by a year, and the retirement of two smaller amphibious ships (LSD) early and moving their replacement outside the Future Year Defense Program, the Pentagon's five-year spending plan accompanying the budget request.


---------- Post added 01-31-2012 at 12:00 AM ---------- Previous post was 01-30-2012 at 11:51 PM ----------

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


News reports and Pentagon statements indicate that the Navy will retire 7 cruisers and 2 LSD's early, while cutting its shipbuilding totals 28% from the FY12 estimate for 2013-2017 (57 ships) to 41 ships in the same period with this budget. Retiring assets early from a Fleet already stressed to meet its commitments, and then eating your shipbuilding "seed corn", strike me as odd ways to demonstrate an emphasis on Seapower. I've talked to some in the Navy who suggest that under the new plan, we'll be able to field as many ships in 2020 as we do now, which is put forward as evidence of great progress and victories within the Pentagon bureaucracy. How this reconciles with the fact that the Fleet we have NOW does not meet the needs of the COCOMS--let alone the Fleet some project to be necessary to underwrite East Asian security in the face of Chinese expansion and modernization--evades me.


---------- Post added at 12:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:00 AM ----------

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The U.S. Navy will keep its aircraft carrier fleet at the now-magical number, 11, while other ships are being slipped or cut over the next five years — even those the Pentagon says it needs and wants to protect — according to a preview of the upcoming fiscal 2013 budget request detailed Jan. 26 by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.

Planned for early retirements are six cruisers that do not have ballistic missile defense (BMD) capability and a seventh cruiser that has BMD upgrades but would be too costly to repair.

Two smaller amphibious ships are slated for early retirement as well, and their replacements would be slipped outside the five-year procurement plan.
 

Scratch

Captain
What the heck ... a laser guided bullet. This must be one of the most awesome gadgets I've come across lately. Still a prototype, but the concept works.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Sandia’s self-guided bullet prototype can hit target a mile away
Sandia Labs News Releases - January 30, 2012

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M — Take two Sandia National Laboratories engineers who are hunters, get them talking about the sport and it shouldn’t be surprising when the conversation leads to a patented design for a self-guided bullet that could help war fighters. (Click here for a video showing the prototype’s flight.)
Sandia researchers Red Jones and Brian Kast and their colleagues have invented a dart-like, self-guided bullet for small-caliber, smooth-bore firearms that could hit laser-designated targets at distances of more than a mile (about 2,000 meters).

“We have a very promising technology to guide small projectiles that could be fully developed inexpensively and rapidly,” Jones said.
Sandia is seeking a private company partner to complete testing of the prototype and bring a guided bullet to the marketplace.
Researchers have had initial success testing the design in computer simulations and in field tests of prototypes, built from commercially available parts, Jones said.
While engineering issues remain, “we’re confident in our science base and we’re confident the engineering-technology base is there to solve the problems,” he said.
Sandia’s design for the four-inch-long bullet includes an optical sensor in the nose to detect a laser beam on a target. The sensor sends information to guidance and control electronics that use an algorithm in an eight-bit central processing unit to command electromagnetic actuators. These actuators steer tiny fins that guide the bullet to the target.
Most bullets shot from rifles, which have grooves, or rifling, that cause them to spin so they fly straight, like a long football pass. To enable a bullet to turn in flight toward a target and to simplify the design, the spin had to go, Jones said.
The bullet flies straight due to its aerodynamically stable design, which consists of a center of gravity that sits forward in the projectile and tiny fins that enable it to fly without spin, just as a dart does, he said.

Computer aerodynamic modeling shows the design would result in dramatic improvements in accuracy, Jones said. Computer simulations showed an unguided bullet under real-world conditions could miss a target more than a half mile away (1,000 meters away) by 9.8 yards (9 meters), but a guided bullet would get within 8 inches (0.2 meters), according to the patent.
Plastic sabots provide a gas seal in the cartridge and protect the delicate fins until they drop off after the bullet emerges from the firearm’s barrel.
The prototype does not require a device found in guided missiles called an inertial measuring unit, which would have added substantially to its cost. Instead, the researchers found that the bullet’s relatively small size when compared to guided missiles “is helping us all around. It’s kind of a fortuitous thing that none of us saw when we started,” Jones said.
As the bullet flies through the air, it pitches and yaws at a set rate based on its mass and size. In larger guided missiles, the rate of flight-path corrections is relatively slow, so each correction needs to be very precise because fewer corrections are possible during flight. But “the natural body frequency of this bullet is about 30 hertz, so we can make corrections 30 times per second. That means we can overcorrect, so we don’t have to be as precise each time,” Jones said.
Testing has shown the electromagnetic actuator performs well and the bullet can reach speeds of 2,400 feet per second, or Mach 2.1, using commercially available gunpowder. The researchers are confident it could reach standard military speeds using customized gunpowder.
And a nighttime field test, in which a tiny light-emitting diode, or LED, was attached to the bullet showed the battery and electronics can survive flight, Jones said.

Researchers also filmed high-speed video of the bullet radically pitching as it exited the barrel. The bullet pitches less as it flies down range, a phenomenon known to long-range firearms experts as “going to sleep.” Because the bullet’s motions settle the longer it is in flight, accuracy improves at longer ranges, Jones said.
“Nobody had ever seen that, but we’ve got high-speed video photography that shows that it’s true,” he said.
Potential customers for the bullet include the military, law enforcement and recreational shooters.
In addition to Jones and Kast, Sandia researchers who helped develop the technology are: engineer Brandon R. Rohrer, aerodynamics expert Marc W. Kniskern, mechanical designer Scott E. Rose, firearms expert James W. Woods and Ronald W. Greene, a guidance, control and simulation engineer.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




---------- Post added 01-31-2012 at 12:00 AM ---------- Previous post was 01-30-2012 at 11:51 PM ----------

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




---------- Post added at 12:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:00 AM ----------

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This admin gives a "good" speech, with a teleprompter to assist of course, but then when you scratch very much below the surface, its not long at all IMHO before you first smell, and then find all the BS all over it.
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


My friend Bob Cox, a senior reporter for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram posted an amazing entry by a serving Marine on his blog. Cox has given me permission to reproduce it below.
more at link...


And first time I hear about such problems for LCS... I thought everything was going smoothly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

navyreco

Senior Member
U.S. goal is to end Afghan combat mission in 2013

# NEW: Lieberman sees "no rationale" for stepping up the withdrawal timetable
# U.S. forces to transition to a training role, Panetta says
# The U.S. goal is for Afghan forces, advised by Americans, to take the lead
# NATO to meet in Chicago in May to discuss the war

The United States and NATO want to end their combat mission in Afghanistan next year, transitioning primarily to a training role in which Afghan security forces will take the lead, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Wednesday.

"Our goal is to complete all of that transition in 2013 and then, hopefully, by mid- to the latter part of 2013, we'll be able to make a transition from a combat role to a training, advise and assist role," he told reporters traveling with him to Brussels, according to a transcript released by the Pentagon. The result will be that "2014 then becomes a year of consolidating the transition and making sure that those gains are in fact held, so that we can move towards a more enduring presence beyond 2014."
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It matches exactly what Sarkozy announced last week: No more (French) combat troops by late 2013. Only a "few hundreds" will stay to train the Afghan army... He probably already knew about the new US timetable.
 

Scratch

Captain
The US navy is starting to thest it's newest E-2D AEW aircraft. They will probably start service in late 2014.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


US Navy to launch E-2D's operational test and evaluation
By: Craig Hoyle London - 12 hours ago

The US Navy is poised to launch the initial operational test and evaluation (IOT&E) process for its new Northrop Grumman E-2D Advanced Hawkeye surveillance aircraft, with the airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) system type expected to achieve initial operating capability status in the fourth quarter of 2014.
Four E-2Ds have been transferred to the navy's Air Test and Evaluation Squadron One (VX-1), with IOT&E work to commence in the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, the service said. Activities will be performed at various locations in the USA, with the process due to conclude in the fourth quarter of FY2012.

"The key objectives for IOT&E are to determine the aircraft's operational suitability and effectiveness in the required mission, evaluate the platform's readiness for fleet introduction, and to assist in the determination of a full rate production decision, based on current programme system design and development requirements," the navy said.
The E-2D is equipped with a Northrop APY-9 surveillance radar, which introduces an increased detection range over the sensors installed in legacy versions of Hawkeye, and an improved capability against small targets such as cruise missiles.

Northrop has so far delivered seven E-2Ds, including two development aircraft, with these having accumulated a combined 3,600 development and flight test hours by 23 January. The company expects to receive a contract early this year for a fourth production lot of six aircraft, and late last month was awarded a $31.8 million deal to cover logistics support costs linked to the programme's low-rate initial production phase.
The US Navy's stated programme of record for the E-2D totals an eventual 75 aircraft. Northrop has, meanwhile, forecast international sales of 25-30 new-generation E-2Ds to existing Hawkeye customers and more to new users, James Mulhall, the company's business development director for AEW and multi-mission command and control aircraft, told IQPC's AEW and Battle Management conference in London last month.
Current international operators of the E-2 include Egypt, France, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan, as recorded by Flightglobal's MiliCAS database.
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

As looming budget cuts force the Pentagon to plan for a smaller US navy, China is accelerating the launch of new, increasingly capable warships as part of a sustained drive to become a major maritime power.

Shanghai's Hudong Zhonghua Shipbuilding Company late last month launched the fourth of China's new 071 amphibious landing ships according to reports carried by Chinese military web sites and the state-controlled media.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
GMA? In the Philippines? they no not of what they speak.The USN is shrinking only slightly and the CGs that will be decommissioned are being replaced by Arliegh Burke DDGs..in fact the USN is the least hard hit of all the US military services.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Follow the link for the full article. It is rather lengthy.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, under fire from Congress and veterans for naming ships after fellow Democrats and social activists, plans to announce another round of ship names in the near future that will be more traditional, a Pentagon official tells The Washington Times.

The official said Mr. Mabus has chosen names for five surface ships - three for war heroes and two for locations. Ships typically are named after states and cities.

“I think they would be more consistent with what most people would say traditions and naming conventions are,” the official said.

Asked whether this was a response to criticism, the official said: “It isn’t. I think if you look at these five additional ships, I think you’ll see examples that are very traditional.” The official said three ships would be named after highly decorated Navy or Marine Corps personnel.

Mr. Mabus, a former Mississippi governor, broke with Navy conventions in the past three years when he named an amphibious ship, two cargo ships and a littoral combat ship after two social activists and two fellow Democrats.

“The Navy’s ship-naming process remains the subject of criticism based on several recent decisions,” Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican, wrote to Mr. Mabus on Tuesday. He said there are still opportunities “for the Navy to show its intent to uphold the integrity and tradition of this process.”

Mr. Hunter, who fought in Afghanistan and Iraq as a Marine Corps officer, renewed his recommendation that the Navy name a ship after a war hero, the late Marine Sgt. Rafael Peralta.

Sgt. Peralta received the Navy Cross for valor in smothering the blast of a grenade with his body during a 2004 raid in Fallujah, Iraq. Congress‘ 2012 budget bill urged the Navy to name a ship after him.

For years, Congress has taken a keen interest in ship-naming, an honor that travels in deployments around the world and sometimes into battle. The power to name ships resides solely with the Navy secretary.

“There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else,” according to a Congressional Research Service report in March.

“Some observers in recent years have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships.”

Lawmakers have begun to closely monitor Mr. Mabus‘ choice of names.

In December, senators added language to the defense budget bill that directs the defense secretary to submit a report to Congress on the process it uses for naming ships. The bill asks whether the Navy has detoured from historical practices and, if so, why.

“There have been a number of controversial ship-namings recently, and one way to deal with that is to have more input and to think more clearly about who we are going to name Navy vessels after,” said Sen. Roy Blunt, Missouri Republican.

I wrote this at mp.net after reading the article..

Good news ..if it holds true.

The first thing Mr Mabus can do is declare that CVN 80 will be named Enterprise. The second thing is to declare that aircraft carriers will no longer be named after presidents/politicians & that no ship of any class will be named after a living person.

How about some of these names for carriers? There are susposed to be named for battles and or famous fighting ships.

Yankee Station
Coral Sea
Saratoga
Ranger
Kitty Hawk
Constellation
Lexington

How about these names for the new America class of LHA?

Fallaugah
Da Nang
Khe Sanh
Inchon
Okinawa
Guadalcanal
 
Top