SampanViking said:
If were China or Russia, I would let the US go to Mongolia.
Exercises are expensive and I wonder if the US was hoping that China and Russia would pull the plug, so that US could indulge in finger pointing.
So let them go and waste their money, it would always be a wholly unrealistic scenario. Does anyone seriously beleive a sizable US garrison could be lifted into Mongolia and maintained in the event of a real conflict?
No me neither.
I disagree about your suggestion.
There is a political angle you are overlooking here. The US is clearly trying to encircle and contain China. Mongolia wouldn't be the biggest piece in this chess game, but it could be a base for SOF. More importantly, having one more member sign on to an anti-Chinese alliance would embolden others. Other threads on SDF have mentioned that Chinese neighbors such as Vietnam are unlikely to sign on to such an alliance because they would bear the brunt of the conflict while the US would get all the benefits. If Mongolia is allowed to get away with this with impunity, it would embolden many other similarly situated countries too.
I suggest that China and Russia should work together to deal with this situation, since a US presence in Mongolia threatens both (albeit Beijing more). This is a very similar situation to the former US presence in Uzbekistan, which was more of a threat to Russian influence.
China and Russia can easily apply sticks and carrots. They can restrict airspace use and cut them off from the outside world, or instead China can send aid and investments. Mongolia cannot be allowed to publicly join an anti-Chinese alliance with impunity.
SampanViking said:
The Japanese matter is something else entirely. In many ways the relationship is not as bad as the headlines suggest. There are many positive contacts at many different levels, it is just the senior contacts that seem fraught.
This could just be a case of high brinksmanship; a game played by both sides, prior to the next round of Oil/Gas negotiaitions regarding the area, due sometime in April.
Taiwan being involved would be a real provocation, I will believe that when I see it.
I agree with your assessment.
I think the best course is to let this one ride out and see how Taiwan reacts.
And then next year, send a few boats over and shell the island too.
In international law, custom and precedent is everything. If they've established a precedent by shelling a disputed territory, they can hardly say we're doing something provocative by doing the same thing. JMSDF can prevent Taiwanese or Chinese (civilians or military) from landing on the island, but they can't do anything about a SRBM hitting it.