We hold more than 3000 billion dollars in yes american currency. It can be taken with one swoop by Washington D.C.
US treasury bonds are bought and sold on the international bond market, usually via third party intermediaries or holding companies. You can't cancel it because you don't know who owns it. Like stocks.
Got my ass banned 3 years ago on r/geopolitics by posting some positive China articles
Same. I was a perm banned from /r/geopolitics because I was neutral-positive on China. Literally these Westerners can't tolerate the truth or opposite opinion. That sub went downhill as a echo chamber circlejerk.
He could take Ukraine within one day with no casualties and it would still be a fiasco. The only strategic objective he could achieve is a disarmed, neutral Ukraine, and even that looks doubtful now.
Exactly. His best case scenario as reduce Ukraine to Belarus-status with a military-installed puppet regime. Occupation is too costly. The second best scenario is force Zelensky to sign an Unequal treaty.
Who stopped George W. Bush Jr. From exercising the illegal war in Iraq which was and is universally considered by every credible foreign policy and military experts as the greatest strategic Blunder in U.S. history.
George Bush needed to weaponize 9/11 unity to a completely different country using flimsy evidence. So long as China doesn't trigger that type of 9/11 unity by pre-emptively attacking US first (like Osama), then I think China can get away with Taiwan.
I think Russian conditions will be neutrality, written obligation not to join NATO, recognition of independence for Donbas, and recognition of Russian control over Crimea.
really. like... that's a pretty 'meh' result compared to all the shit Russia is going through economically. Might as well annex some territories and also demand neutrality.
There will be no such thing. Russia's aim is to take the entire country and turn it into Belarus. They will change the commanders to ones that are pro-Russian. The rest don't really matter because the military will ensure that the right politicians get elected etc.
This is so smart. I agree 1000% The best scenario is Belarus-puppet ally.
To be honest, those comments are pretty tame compared to what's been said on western social media regarding Ukrainian women.
Still it's a bad sign that CCP seems to be losing the media war on its own turf. On Chinese social media, there were plenty of posters making anti war statements regarding this Russian intervention, but not against previous US interventions. Not to mention, CCTV's official weibo account yesterday made a post about fundraising for supporting Ukrainian resistance, soliciting donations from Chinese public. The level of sheer incompetence is disheartening. After all, PRC government has more or less adopted a neutral stance.
Eastern Europe is not a core area of Chinese interest, and China isn't going to de-couple from West and sign a formal alliance with Russia, so why do censorship to silence anti-war voices? Does Russia do censorship to help Chinese territorial claims in SCS?
I am average Go player (Weiqi or Baduk etc) and about say 20 kyu (percentile wise its about average) and there is this Go AI open sourced called KataGo which is basically already superhuman (11D) on even single GPU hardware (say rtx2080 or above) on normal time limits...
If I play with the intent to win and win as much points as possible, I end up losing a maximum amount of points and will never be able to score a win against the AI not even in a million years...
But although Go like Chess is a win/lose, and pro level often its decided by as little different as half a point (there is really no draw in Go unlike Chess) in Go there is a more granular level of scoring than Chess which is binary (either King is checkmate or it is not, whereas in Go you can lose/win by x amount of points accurate to half a point)
So if I play the AI going in knowing I will never win but playing "safely" and conservatively, if I give up say 10 to 20 points, then I can usually manage to lose the game but with "only" a lose of 10 to 20 points, whereas if I play to win, I end up with often losing 50 or even 100 points (basically majority of the board)...
US is the stronger player for sure against China, but like you said about 围点打援 etc if she brings the fight to China's doorstep and do that Hollywood crap, she will lose badly... (conventionally, not talking about MAD escalation ladder etc)
Geopolitically America is playing a lot of overplay moves that in the long term are all to its detriment, if it were to play more lightly and be less greedy it would actually end up with more points.
Exactly. In other words, US needs to station kajillion CATOBARs and 5th gens in Taiwan region to forever prevent China to invade (again and again and again). It's dumb, US can't think it can win one-off battle, this is a long war and China will just invade again, again, again. It will be like Afghanistan, what is US exit strategy in defending Taiwan? It's either a) Force China to sign unequal treaty relinquish Taiwan forever, or b) Joint ROC-US combined conquest of Mainland. Both are impossible, so even if US can defeat one invasion attempt, another will happen again, and US will overstretch it's imperialism overreach.
No. Any people would learn to love an enemy who didn't torture, oppress, exploit as an foreign conqueror. Let alone how much the US did for Japan. The Japanese economy and industry was literally built from ashes with huge amounts of US capital investments, technological transfers, under the peaceful environment and security provided by the US, with a huge and profitable market access given to them pretty much for free. Besides, the Japanese has no hope of opposing the US anyways, she has has no friendly superpower alternatives to pit the US against.
It would be inhuman for the Japanese to NOT love the USA.
Japan was already developed and industrialized great power before occupation by US. So Japan could have become rich by itself too. How come Phillipines, Thailand, and other US allies did not become rich like Japan?
I don't understand it. Instead of saying this is nothing. it's just western media demonizing China/Chinese people. Why don't you just condemn those 'few comments' so that there are thousands of Chinese voices that's on the right side. Isn't that the more direct and moral thing to do?
I am condemning behavior so clearly and unambiguously wrong. But you think that would lead to Chinese could not speak at all? I understand that there are moral dilemmas and gray zones in this world. But I am smart enough to know making sexual explicit remarks about female Ukraine refugees ain't one.
Isn't that what I did?
You've got to be kidding me! Nathan Chen, a born and bred Chinese American, won a gold for his country. But people on this forum condemned him as a traitor to all Chinese people. Many people gave likes to those posts. somehow that association works? Haven't you seen how some Chinese tourists' behavior in foreign countries can badly damage China's image?
now let's try the opposite side. few Chinese netizens were very thoughtful and supportive to a country that was struck by natural disasters and people from that country were really thankful of them and developed appreciation for all Chinese people. Would I be wrong (or spineless) to think they brought pride to all Chinese people?
If we had to condemn every internet comment, then we will be busy all day. I would suggest not to take anything said on internet seriously. There is 25-30% of the US population that is batshit insane and out-of-touch with reality. Just assume that idiots exist everywhere and your life will be a lot easier.