Like I said at least a battalion worth of equipment a day lost. Visually confirmed:
You're going around in circles now.
I've already responded to this argument of yours in the previous 2 posts.
Like I said at least a battalion worth of equipment a day lost. Visually confirmed:
Not exactly. The Arabs’ wars with Israel and the Falkland Islands conflict demonstrated that superior numbers and firepower isn’t everything. Despite what the pro-Ukraine faction shows on social media, the Russians are clearly still conducting maneuver and combined arms warfare just well enough for the Ukrainian forces to get outmaneuvered.Isn’t that pretty much inevitable due to overwhelming strength?
The same thing was said about the other recent conflicts in Libya, Syria and Azerbaijan. "B-b-b-but this is all propaganda! I swear!"You're going around in circles now.
I've already responded to this argument of yours in the previous 2 posts.
Isn’t that pretty much inevitable due to overwhelming strength?
Isn’t that pretty much inevitable due to overwhelming strength?
Isn’t that pretty much inevitable due to overwhelming strength?
I expect the Ukrainians to have around 150,000 in regular ground army troops, plus another 110,000 to 120,000 in paramilitary.
So its not really overwhelming when the Russians only sent one third of the 300,000 they have arranged at the borders. The amount of Russians used in the campaign might even left them outnumbered. So what the Russians achieved in days remain remarkable, however, the decision to use only one third was clearly dumb, overestimating themselves while underestimating their opponents. They should have sent the entire invasion army in one time instead of piece and parcel.
Take you heads out of the ground and see what is happening.