I need to know the source of this statement from Pentagon, this is pretty big deal!Ukraine’s general staff reports that Russia has lost 19,500 soldiers and 58,500 wounded. These numbers are so ridiculous. That would mean Russia lost 40% of the 200k invasion force. The Pentagon has put a more realistic number of 4K dead and 7k wounded. I think the Ukrainians are projected and that’s their true losses. If those losses were true then Ukraine is two weeks away from Moscow.
Depends on the Leopard 1 typeLOL...
Old German tanks could be sent to Ukraine
Rheinmetall could start the delivery of up to 50 Leopard 1 tanks in six weeks, the company’s chairman has revealed to journalists
Obviously, if Russia were to mobilise for war it would take some months for this to be reflected on the battlefield. The short-term gain would be limited to retaining the current crop of trained conscripts. To spin this around, it suggests that one reason why Russia has not mobilised is because Moscow still seeks or sees as potentially desirable a fairly limited settlement, built upon battlefield dynamics to be played out over the next couple of months using forces that are currently available or can be generated on short notice.
When asked by Rep. Bill Keating (D-Mass.) how long he thought the war could last, Milley responded that it was “hard to tell.”
“It’s a bit early, still. Even though we’re a month-plus into the war, there is much of the ground war left in Ukraine,” he added. “But I do think this is a very protracted conflict, and I think it’s at least measured in years. I don’t know about a decade, but at least years for sure.
"That’s why the way I am talking to them is absolutely justified. I don’t have any more lives to give. I don’t have any more emotions. I’m no longer interested in their diplomacy that leads to the destruction of my country,” the president added.
Note that the troll shows his abysmal 'reading comprehension" (at best) and his fanatical bigotry.You are venturing into pure racism. Imagine the reaction on this forum if you replaced "Russia" with "China," because that's the type of content that Chinese have to put up with in the past decades from MSM. Dehumanizing an entire ethnicity. Reported.
URL]
Doesn't take much imagination to look at those two statements, see a western alliance eager to bleed Russia "to the last Ukrainian" and a Ukrainian leader wising up to that...
He certainly is a bad man. What else would you call someone who knowingly brought destruction and death to his country by following foreign orders?I read in Zelensky not a bad man, perhaps a brave man, but certainly not a big man, caught at the center of big events
He sees much more convergence in the interests of his country and these of the foreign countries in question than you do.He certainly is a bad man. What else would you call someone who knowingly brought destruction and death to his country by following foreign orders?
Ukraine is on its way to become a Syria 2.0
"A Ukrainian mother of four said she wanted to die after being raped for more than 12 hours by Russian soldiers."
Many men here have proudly proclaimed that they embrace the 'moral' principle of 'might makes right'.
Many men here have professed their hatred of Ukrainians, particularly alleged 'Banderivtsi', who deserve to be wiped out.
So it's reasonable to infer that at least some men here, however much they may pretend otherwise in public,
really admire or envy the Russian soldiers who evidently repeatedly raped this Ukrainian woman.
Why would these 'might makes right' men have any moral objection to taking women by force?
Well, currently the only convergence between Ukraine and "foreign countries" is Afghanistan, Syria and Libya.He sees much more convergence in the interests of his country and these of the foreign countries in question than you do.