How did they allow the fleet to come to a state where none of their attack submarines are operational? Just pathetic.
Also how come the oldest ships in that chart, the Type 23 frigates, have better availability than the way more modern Type 45 destroyer?
Also how come the oldest ships in that chart, the Type 23 frigates, have better availability than the way more modern Type 45 destroyer?
They spent too much on Royal Gardens and don’t have enough left for the navy.
"China-Has-Done-It-So-Can-We", EMCATs-On-Any-Flatdecks Edition.
The ship is the Izumo DDH from the JMSDF, but the system is proposed by General Atomics.
The ship is the Izumo DDH from the JMSDF, but the system is proposed by General Atomics.
Also its interesting that they propose two lengths of catapult.
Does this mean General Atomics is now copying CSSC?
Also just realised that I should've posted this in the US Military Thread instead, not here. My bad.
I'm amused by the fact that they included an E-2 and a F/A-18 in the picture, because why not...
Like, does the E-2 even fits in the hangar or the elevator?. Though I am aware the point is just to showcase the catapult and the MQ-25's more than anything else
Like, does the E-2 even fits in the hangar or the elevator?. Though I am aware the point is just to showcase the catapult and the MQ-25's more than anything else
