I personally have no predictions as to what 076's flight deck geometry will ultimately look like, and I think the best thing for everyone to do is just wait and see how the dust settles instead of trying to justify predictions.
However -- what you've written here about the "EM cat launch position eating into the landing strip" is not that important for whether a CATOBAR carrier or LHD (in 076's case) has an angled landing strip or not.
The angled landing strip has multiple benefits, one of which is that on some carriers it can allow you to have one or two launch positions not eating into your landing strip. However that is not very important because most carriers do cyclical launch and recovery anyway.
That is to say, there are very few situations when your CATOBAR (or STOBAR) carrier or LHD should be conducting simultaneous launch and recovery operations.
What is actually important for an angled landing strip, is that it allows you to recover aircraft while freeing up more of your bow deck space to position and spot aircraft during a recovery cycle.
If you do not have an angled landing strip and instead have a straight deck arrangement, what you end up with is much less bow deck space to position and spot aircraft; almost your entire flight deck has to be used for recovering aircraft except for the side edges of the starboard deck.
See below to see what I mean, a quick and dirty adaptation from the drawing from horobeyo compared to a straight deck arrangement. The green is the theoretical "safe" area you can use to spot aircraft or have crew or deck vehicles be placed.
.... all of this isn't to say I have a particularly strong feeling as to which configuration the final 076 will go for or which one is "superior" because ultimately each has its costs.
But the discussion about angled deck versus straight deck in general (i.e.: not in isolation to 076 only) should be made not in relation to "simultaneous launch and recovery" because that is a relatively unimportant capability or role even for full sized carriers.
Instead, what's important is the real estate to spot and position aircraft on the ship while also conducting recovery.
I.e.: people should view "simultaneous launch and recovery" as useless and just ignore that term completely because its significance is vastly overrated in context of modern cyclical flight operations.
Last edited:
