ugly @ss musicAnother day, another test flight:
ugly @ss musicAnother day, another test flight:
Are they able to carry it internally ??TUSAS couldn't be left behind so they dropped an LGK-82 from Anka-3:
Likely not but the Tolun can.Are they able to carry it internally ??
At least it still useful to have the capability to carry bigger loadout even if it cost drag and visibility.Likely not but the Tolun can.
I don't like the Anka-3 for its small size. It should be enlarged with twin engines or one larger F404-F1D2/RD-33I equivalent. That way it can carry larger munitions internally.
Likely not but the Tolun can.
I don't like the Anka-3 for its small size. It should be enlarged with twin engines or one larger F404-F1D2/RD-33I equivalent. That way it can carry larger munitions internally.
Don't forget the most important characteristic for this thing: increased RCSAt least it still useful to have the capability to carry bigger loadout even if it cost drag and visibility.
I can't imagine them not developing a larger stealth flying wing that can actually carry MK84 and/or SOM internally.My understanding that the flying wing type UCAVs are going to be the first wave of precision attack aircraft anyway. Weapon load is probably not as important as range, endurance, and reduced radar cross section.
It's why I talk about visibility... if they scale up the design it also help with avionics testing. They are taking big steps, all data and development help.Don't forget the most important thing for this thing: increased RCS
I can't imagine them not developing a larger stealth flying wing that can actually carry MK84 and/or SOM internally.