Man, the Navy's somewhat crazy plans from the 90s are slowly but surely coming together....Excerpt from "A REVIEW OF FRANCE'S NEW GENERATION BARRACUDA CLASS NUCLEAR-PROPELLED SUBMARINES (SSN)" in DzKK official gazette January 2024 issue
"With the recent commissioning of the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant, Turkey will take its place among the countries using nuclear energy. Subsequently, it is foreseen that knowledge and experience in nuclear energy in all sectors, both civilian and military, will increase in a short period of time and this energy will be integrated into new capacity building areas.
In addition, the introduction of nuclear technology in Turkey is also a turning point for the planned national nuclear-powered submarine programme in the medium term. It is inevitable that the transition to nuclear-propelled submarines will lead to critical developments for the Turkish Naval Forces.
In particular, the indigenous heavy torpedo AKYA and the submarine-launched ATMACA G/M will add strength to the power of our submarines, and with the acquisition of long-range GEZGİN cruise missile capability by our nuclear submarines, our submarines will become one of the most effective weapons in the world.
In the process of transition to nuclear energy, considering our limited knowledge and experience in the field, it is considered that there are various issues that need to be taken into consideration for our Naval Forces. Apart from the operation and maintenance of the nuclear reactor, which is a highly technical issue, it is important that projects in line with our concept of submarine utilisation and preliminary preparations for the training of submariner personnel be initiated now. Thus, the foresighted plans to be made as early as the project design phase will provide guidance in solving problems before they arise."
They're not asking for submarines from France, they're just studying whether operating nuclear subs in 2035/40/whatever year makes sense operationally, financially amd technologically.It is probably going to be tough to convince the French to sell that technology to Turkey. Look at how many hoops Brazil is having to take to get nuclear subs. But after the AUKUS submarine deal it might happen.
Well, for example, yes. And yes, that's a valid reason.An aircraft carrier? What the heck for, to send it to Libya?
A reasonable carrier isn't that expensive.I think Turkey might go bankrupt at this point with unnecessary expenses. Their economy isn't that good as it is.
Kizilelma is a CTOL aircraft.I dont like this aircraft carrier project either. Quite pointless i think. How is a carrier going to help in the Mediterranean or the Red Sea? Larger Anadolu/Trakya type LHDs capable of deploying Kizilelma/TB-3 and UUVs make much more sense.
1-2 carriers, reasonable carriers, can be built for a price tag of 2-3 contemporary frigates.You will only ever build 1 maybe 2 carriers.
Their ambition goes beyond the Med and Red Sea. Think of Africa and Asia.I dont like this aircraft carrier project either. Quite pointless i think. How is a carrier going to help in the Mediterranean or the Red Sea? Larger Anadolu/Trakya type LHDs capable of deploying Kizilelma/TB-3 and UUVs make much more sense.
I have seen people defend this by comparing it to the KAAN 5th generation fighter but I dont think that is a valid argument either. For one, you will be building hundreds of these aircraft. You will only ever build 1 maybe 2 carriers. That conventional carrier is not worth the investment a project of this sort would consume.