Trump 2.0 official thread

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
Crazy amount of people that don't understand the consumer pays for the tariffs.
Deprogramming may take some time...

View attachment 150864
The education system in the US maybe lacking because the fact the these people think that the importers or exporters are going pay for the tariffs is mindblowing, even 10% is already expensive for any company to pay and at best the pay like 50% of 10%. In realty anywhere in the world tariffs and import charges are pay by the consumers. Tariffs are taxes.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
I’ve come to the startling realization that Fallout is basically future as imagined by Boomers and reality is future as molded by Boomers…
You know, with all this talk about Fallout, could we actually be on the verge of the resource wars. I mean with all the empty ports and clearly there are going to be a lot of empty shelves in the near future, in time frame of a few months, could we actually see the beginnings of the resource war.

Just that, it wouldn’t be a war for oil or ores, but one for toothbrushes, toilet paper and aspirins etc. The US military rolling into Canada and Mexico not to invade for territory, well maybe a bit of that too, but to raid supermarkets, drug stores etc to ‘liberate’ essentials for the American people.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
You know, with all this talk about Fallout, could we actually be on the verge of the resource wars. I mean with all the empty ports and clearly there are going to be a lot of empty shelves in the near future, in time frame of a few months, could we actually see the beginnings of the resource war.

Just that, it wouldn’t be a war for oil or ores, but one for toothbrushes, toilet paper and aspirins etc. The US military rolling into Canada and Mexico not to invade for territory, well maybe a bit of that too, but to raid supermarkets, drug stores etc to ‘liberate’ essentials for the American people.

Trump is too incompetent to pull off a full authoritarian/Fascist regime like Pre-War US. Don’t know if that’s a good or bad thing.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
Trump is too incompetent to pull off a full authoritarian/Fascist regime like Pre-War US. Don’t know if that’s a good or bad thing.
I don’t know man, it doesn’t take full authoritarian/Fascist regime to have things deteriorate to such a point.

When the shelves are truly empty and the essentials are truly gone or just so ridiculously priced, human nature will take over, many mid to lower income Americans, in the border states, will probably be forced to head to their closest neighbours for essentials, smuggling may become an issue and if supplies in the nearby countries are strained as well, who knows what might happen from there.

It’s not so much the competence that causes the problem, because we probably wouldn’t even have reached the point of it being a problem, it’s the incompetence and erratic behaviour that’s truly scary.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
In that case China should just limit herself to her neighbourhood as a her core interests then like I said in another thread. In such a scenario, I think it would be benefitial for China to just try and strike a deal with the US whereby the US agrees to allow China have more say and control over her immediate neighbourhood and sovereignty (Taiwan, SCS) while the US has free reign to remain the single hegemony over the world. I believe Chinese leaders would 100% agree to this deal and they actually want such a deal. However the main issue is that the US doesn't seem to want to leave even this to China, hence the current impasse. I actually think it will be a WIN solution for both powers(US and China) China gets to finally reunite the country and gain her full sovereignty over contested areas while the US gets to maintainnher hold over much of the world.
I still think China's current leaders will limit themselves to only internevtion in protecting their core interests as they have said before which is Taiwan and SCS. They won't involve themselves in any other countries /issues. So this non interventionist policy will carry on for a long time to come. They are not ready to start a new revolutionary change in foreign policy and all the political risks that comes with such a change. So the status quo will carry on despite all the wishes and talks of some members on here.
I still think its a good policy for China, China should focus only on herself.
At the current time, it isn't China that wants a deal. China is in fact refusing to deal at all, not just rejecting any specific deal, and instead escalated.
It's like two boxers fighting . Your opponent collapses in the 3rd round not because you are a better boxer but because he had an underlying heart condition .

You go around flexing how you are the greatest boxer ever .
It's more like your paid thugs broke the guys knees 40 years ago but the thug got sent to the hospital afterwards.
 
Top