Aren't they phasing it out??
Trump 2.0 official thread
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
Knew it was going to be something like this, I mentioned it earlier in this thread they actually can't do too much to H1-Bs without going through Congress but they got a few levers they can pull.
Honestly think this is the least controversial policy for Trump.
H1-Bs only really useable in this case if a company is looking to pick up a hot-shot researcher or exec instead of filling out an Indian IT contracting job.
To be fair nowadays anyone with an undergraduate degree can pretty much move freely everywhere except the few megacities. But I don't see the system as a whole being phased out anytime soon.
Immigration isn't a problem. North America was entirely built on immigrants. They came from diverse backgrounds which caused friction. The issue is that that over the past ~40 or so years White people in North America have become convinced that North America was always White and that the Golden Age of North America was during a period of when White people were most prevalent. They don't care to learn that during this so called Golden Age, White people discriminated against other Whites on top of people of colour!
Yes you had institutionalized racism against African American's, but the developments since the first Trump administration point to a more universal anti-White movement.
Outside of that, these people have become indoctrinated into an extremely Laissez-faire (neo-liberal) form of capitalism. In which the government has basically no part in regulating industry, healthcare or any part of society as a whole.
Yes you had institutionalized racism against African American's, but the developments since the first Trump administration point to a more universal anti-White movement.
Outside of that, these people have become indoctrinated into an extremely Laissez-faire (neo-liberal) form of capitalism. In which the government has basically no part in regulating industry, healthcare or any part of society as a whole.
It is loosening for uncompetitive cities. It makes no sense to restrict people settling when it is already being drained.
In some tier 1 cities it has only become tighter.
I am not advocating migration control for sake of it. I view it as something like Chinese economic system: benign control of natural process to balancing out its negative tendencies. Swarming into better city makes sense at individual level, but can be bad for the country.
Keeping Hukou going will be considered one of the best moves China has made long term and clear differentiator between China and other developing countries suffering from Big city ills and too many slums.
Cause it prevents too much buildup in a handful of big cities, help spread out talent and development into broader areas of inland China. This reduces cost in those tier 1 cities and also reduces congestion. Ultimately, China needs to ensure all of its provinces and regions have similar levels of prosperity and have atleast one city that is as advanced as tier 1 cities.
The more development is spread out, the more GDP per capita will rise without too much inflation.
FriedRiceNSpice
Major
broadsword
Brigadier
Canada should adopt a similar policy, like its tariff on China's EVs.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Yuck. Fake people gross me out. I don't know if it's more disgusting hearing him bullshit that he could have destroyed China but didn't want to because Xi's his friend or when he's grovelling like this. This orange fucker can actually make victory taste bad...
Talk about shooting themselves in the foot.