lmao you have got to be kidding meeven China. How do you think it ended up so big with a big population if not for abosrbing different cultures and creating a unified one in the process?
lmao you have got to be kidding meeven China. How do you think it ended up so big with a big population if not for abosrbing different cultures and creating a unified one in the process?
Yeah you are right, China was there before the Big Bang. In fact Big Bang happened when a Chinese guy lit up his cigarette too close to a star.lmao you have got to be kidding me
Personally, I don’t think the United States is like a melting pot—it’s more like a clearly divided fruit platter. There are distinct boundaries and segregation between the lives of people from different communities and ethnicities, and these divisions are much more pronounced than in China.US is not a failed melting pot lmao. There are still millions of people who would move there given the chance. It‘s just going through a rough patch and would recover.
Also all big countries are melting pots to a certain extent even China. How do you think it ended up so big with a big population if not for abosrbing different cultures and creating a unified one in the process?
Yeah, and fence sitting bananas are cheerleaders whose try hard to get accept by whoever above them. At the end they all end up fighting to chose top bunk in camp. So Siege sifu is wise to dip first.Personally, I don’t think the United States is like a melting pot—it’s more like a clearly divided fruit platter. There are distinct boundaries and segregation between the lives of people from different communities and ethnicities, and these divisions are much more pronounced than in China.
If you look closely at the concept of "whiteness" in the U.S., you’ll notice that the definition of white has continuously expanded. Initially, only the Anglo-Saxons who first arrived in the New World were considered white. Later, the Irish, Germans, Italians, and Slavs were gradually accepted as white. This is easy to understand—first-generation immigrants often didn’t speak English, so their lives were confined within their own communities. For example, back in the mid-20th century, Italians were widely regarded as Black (or not white). Second-generation immigrants, however, could speak English and were thus accepted as white.
Humans are visual creatures. In our subconscious and emotional perception, if someone looks different, they are fundamentally different. The physical difference between Italians and Anglo-Saxons is obviously much smaller than that between white and Black people. Therefore, the conflict between Black and white people in American society seems unsolvable. I strongly agree with a blogger I really like, who argues that America’s core conflict is actually between *cultural whites* and *cultural Blacks*.
I told my cell phone provider I will HAPPILY take the cell number (xxx)444-4444 if I got it free for life-as to be a lightning rod of the #4 in Chinese areas-no answer so far.This superstition has absolutely zero effect on me.What's better than having this f4t pr1ck fvck getting his own face slapped barely 4 months later?
Yeah, and fence sitting bananas are cheerleaders whose try hard to get accept by whoever above them. At the end they all end up fighting to chose top bunk in camp. So Siege sifu is wise to dip first.
The probability is quite high that ROCK and Japan will obtain nuclear weapons.We have observed recent rumours suggesting that Trump intends to shift US strategy from containing China and Russia towards homeland defence.
I have a question. Should the United States pursue strategic retrenchment and reduce its security commitments to South Korea and Japan, how likely is it that these nations would acquire nuclear weapons? Global nuclear non-proliferation relies upon America's global influence; should the United States gradually withdraw from its position of world leadership, it could well trigger a new wave of nuclear proliferation.
If China is willing to sanction it's erstwhile ally North Korea for possessing nuclear weapons, China is going to do at least that much to SK and JP.We have observed recent rumours suggesting that Trump intends to shift US strategy from containing China and Russia towards homeland defence.
I have a question. Should the United States pursue strategic retrenchment and reduce its security commitments to South Korea and Japan, how likely is it that these nations would acquire nuclear weapons? Global nuclear non-proliferation relies upon America's global influence; should the United States gradually withdraw from its position of world leadership, it could well trigger a new wave of nuclear proliferation.
Yes, for the same reason, I believe East Asians (whether Chinese, Japanese, or Korean) will never be regarded as white, even though white people often refer to them as the "model minority." But when you label a group as the "model minority," it fundamentally means you do not see them as "one of us".Yeah, and fence sitting bananas are cheerleaders whose try hard to get accept by whoever above them. At the end they all end up fighting to chose top bunk in camp. So Siege sifu is wise to dip first.