No. Short answer, no.
Trump 2.0 official thread
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
No. Short answer, no.
They tried to negotiate that with the same play for RCEP membership, and dealing with India negotiation that general point delayed the RCEP implementation for 2 years!
All Modi wanted was accreditation, which seems like some sort of backdoor trick to export people into other countries.
Two years they talked about that, before finally the Indians gave up, saying RCEP was not what they thought and was not for them, very negative on its way out of the door.
Then to make a long story short, after the agreement was ratified, trade between ASEAN and China shot up like nuts.
No India anywhere to be found.
Yeah, but the farmers and landlords who already own land/farms wont want their interests touched even if its for the long term greater good of the countrh as a whole . I dont blame them, i will do the same, im.sure you would as well.
Will you prioritse yourself and your family(wive,kids et ) first or will you prioritise the interest of your countrys people first over yourself and your family? Lol.
I guess the issue is that a vast proportion(almost half) of indias workforce is still employed in the agricultural industry and ita related fields, so that mass of population makes any reform.which touch on their benefits/interesta very complicated since they can basically bring down the government easily. So no leader has ever dared crossed that path. Modi tried a lottle bit and got humiliated and had to backtrack spectacularly. It wont happen again.
Anyway despite all this handicap, india is still developing though. Maybe not as fast as China during this same stage of her development but stil india is still developing quite fast(it looks slow only because China amd her east Asian peers rise was so fast and spectacular that it makes india's growth/development look very slow im comparison) and they still have alot of room for growth and a very young population.
The Incontinental Divider. lol
FriedRiceNSpice
Major
Which is why land reform is tough in a democratic system. Land reform was possible in Soviet Russia, China, South Korea, and the province of Taiwan due to the existence of strong authoritarian governments that were able to prioritize the interests of the majority and the nation over those of the minority.
Ahahaha....this Trump presidency has shown how powerful and influential the US is. We might not like it but it is what it is. Lol
So the racism against Chinese people went from students to regular employees all the way up to CEO's now,
and isnt that most ceos that hold some shares in lots of companies all over the world. I imagine thats normal shit
Oh yeah the trade deal they are talking with Uk rn also has provisions to allow certain % of indian workers, they do this with every deal.
India got $130 bn in remittance last year (from all countries) thats the highest of any country, huge chunk for the Foreign reserves.
From Golden showers to Golden whitehouse to Golden Dome defense system...gold gold gold...
Idk if its about power exactly, its just Europe is afraid/unused to this, If they had collectively stood their ground it would have been much bad for US, but old suits neocons/neoliberals of europe cant even dream of that scenario, its not like trump isnt easy to fool/fold.
Tim cook gave him 24 karat gold and walked away with billions of exemptions, He likes headlines than actual work.
Apple promised $350 bn in investment 1st term too and that never happened.
Which is why I give credit to Canada and Mexico.
How much of the naval budget did they skim to do this?
According to a from a think tank known as the Third Way: the American public on average increasingly favors a "cooperative" rather than a "competitive" or "adversarial" relationship with China.
^ Graphic from associated Semafor
Some highlights from the Third Way report:
Thanks to the dramatic effects and market uncertainties created by President Trump's recent tariffs and threats of tariffs, more Americans — especially in their capacity as insatiable consumers — have found cause to (begrudgingly) "work with" rather than "work against" China.
The American public might still dislike, if not "hate the CCP," but the American consumer absolutely does not want to lose access to the affordable Chinese made creature comforts that they've grown accustomed, if not addicted to.
^ Graphic from associated Semafor
Some highlights from the Third Way report:
Thanks to the dramatic effects and market uncertainties created by President Trump's recent tariffs and threats of tariffs, more Americans — especially in their capacity as insatiable consumers — have found cause to (begrudgingly) "work with" rather than "work against" China.
The American public might still dislike, if not "hate the CCP," but the American consumer absolutely does not want to lose access to the affordable Chinese made creature comforts that they've grown accustomed, if not addicted to.
Last edited:
If a ship carrying Indian made products for the US market, it will still be taxed, if the ship is made in China.