Trump 2.0 official thread

T

Thecore

New Member
Registered Member
A potato said:
View attachment 154164

The context is that the US soldiers behind Trump Booed at the media and Biden name, violating the A-political role the US Military has therefore the US Army is the new Waffen SS.
Click to expand...
Trump didn’t even have to create a Waffen SS equivalent. It’s like if the Wermacht took off their uniforms to reveal the SS runes that were on their collars all along.
 
W

W20

Junior Member
Registered Member
The West is a colossal kindergarten: I don't like garlic soup, garlic soup is Adolf. That's how Westerners talk.

Joe "I'm a Zionist" Biden is Adolf.
Donald Likud Trump is Adolf.

It's completely ridiculous.

A hundred years ago, the most influential fascism was German fascism; today, the most influential Barbarism is the Barbarism inspired by the Old Testament.

 
W

W20

Junior Member
Registered Member
All except one

All the 'American' candidates except one agree: recognizing the population as Citizens is madness; the idea of Civilization goes against the Barbarism of the Old Testament.

The Barbarism of the Old Testament is the cultural and ideological foundation of our Judeo-Christian Empire.
 
R

Racek49

New Member
Registered Member
ansy1968 said:
Bro most of those exporters are American, European, SK and Japanese company. Apple alone accounts for 22% of Chinese exports to the US. So the narrative that China suffers is false and the one who is lobbying the most are the multinationals.

From my readings, the Chinese restriction strategy is the right one, a total ban will force your customers to be your competitor, destroying your monopoly.
Click to expand...
Of course, there will also be a reduction in the profits of these companies, which they transfer to the US. And these are big numbers. The balance of payments, which is almost balanced today, could fluctuate significantly.
 
Wrought

Wrought

Senior Member
Registered Member
huemens said:
Is this true? Does China really buy all of it's ethane from US?
Click to expand...

Yes, it's true. But it's not the whole truth. There are substitues for ethane.

China imported
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
per day of U.S. ethane in 2024—a substantial volume representing nearly half of total U.S. ethane exports. At first glance, this might seem like significant leverage. But context matters. Ethane accounts for only 8–10 percent of China’s total ethylene production feedstock, with the vast majority coming from naphtha (70 percent) and liquified petroleum gas (15–20 percent). Even if U.S. ethane disappeared entirely tomorrow, China would lose at most 5–6 percent of its ethylene capacity in the short term.

More critically, China’s petrochemical infrastructure was built with exactly this kind of supply disruption in mind. The country’s newest crackers utilize
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
—particularly Linde’s PyroCrack systems—which can switch between gas feeds (e.g., ethane) and liquid feeds (e.g., naphtha). This is not theoretical capability; it is engineered resilience designed to handle, among other things, geopolitical volatility.

When U.S. ethane supplies are cut off, Chinese plants do not shut down—they simply burn more naphtha.
Click to expand...

Same source that I posted a couple pages back.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top