I am particularly critical of such measures taken now by China, because this direction in economic policy should have been taken into consideration and implemented a decade ago, and the inherent problems that are recurring today could have been avoided.For China, decoupling is a strategic shift driven by its 'dual circulation' model. It will continue to export but wants to build resilient, autonomous supply chains and ramp up domestic demand and innovation so it’s not overly reliant on the US and other consumer markets for its growth. It's about reducing vulnerability to external political pressures and shocks.
There's a camp of economists who believes China can never be a peer of the US because it can't transition to a consumption based model, without fully understanding what that consumption model entails. China is not going to be a golden credit card spender (term coined by investor Howard Marks about a kind of spending habit where one assumes they have no credit limit and the bill never comes), it's not in the culture of the Chinese.
Essentially, China is trying to transform from a pure factory to a tech powerhouse, which ensures its industrial base isn't at the mercy of geopolitical volatility. This industrial base will eventually be largely consumed by the Chinese people as much as the rest of the world.
Chinese industrial production should have been redirected to benefit Chinese well-being, not to China's export sector that maintains the high standard of living of the entire world, especially the Western world, in exchange for dollars.