Well, I want to hear your perspectives on the relationship between SOEs (I mean state-subsidies here) and CCP political control. Therefore, would rolling back SOE subsidies, along with subsidies directed toward MIC 2025 programs, while giving the PRC's private sector (including allowing more millionaires and billionaires to move more of their assets abroad) more freedom seriously weaken the CCP's ability to mobilize support and resources, especially in times of crises? My question is over whether more control or less control over the economy would allow the CCP to maintain its legitimacy and support. Also, based on what I have learned, Beijing's current approach to MIC 2025 is more like import-substitution industrialization. Would private enterprises without state subsidies still be able to compete effectively with Apple, Samsung, Microsoft, Intel, etc.?
That’s a weirdly phrased question.
Political power comes from a longstanding concept of a nation state. Competence is the main factor in tempering it. I assume, if a SOE did something stupid, Beijing would just drop it and/or disavow the connections, like what Washington is doing with Boeing now.
Rolling back subsidies would give CPC more money to invest in another sector, so it depends on how that money is used.
But generally it will only affect that person who is in charge of deciding that thing you know? If they’re incompetent, the rest of the administration will fire them or refuse to renew their position.
As for competition, it depends on what it is about. Obviously competing with heavily subsidized companies without subsidies of their own is difficult, but given the different tech base, there’s a lot of variables. It could either go like Huawei vs US 5G companies, where Huawei utterly dominates, like Chinese PC companies vs American ones, where it’s sort of equal, or go like Chinese farming vs US farming, where the latter completely dominates.