Trade War with China

Status
Not open for further replies.
now I read
17:21, 29-Jan-2019
Be alarmed to U.S. zero-sum thinking behind 5G competition
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

According to a New York Times report last Saturday, the United States sees 5G as a part of a new arms race where winner takes all – “economic, intelligence and military advantages for much of this century.” The report reveals a deep-rooted ideology of the Trump administration, the zero-sum thinking that has blocked the U.S. from mutual understanding with China.

Huawei, China's leading telecommunications producer fell prey to this zero-sum mentality since 2012 when the U.S. barred it from selling equipment in the U.S. out of security concerns. Now, the U.S. involves its allies in this zero-sum game against Huawei by excluding it from the building of 5G network worldwide, adding more fuel to the flames.

Despite the efforts made by the U.S., no hard evidence has ever been found implicating Huawei in any espionage, noted in the report. And to be honest, the U.S. concerns do not hold much water these days concerning its international credibility, the recent Cuba embassy “sonic attack” turned out to be the cricket's call is a case in point.

Therefore, it becomes evident that, as the Global Times put it, it is only a strategic move by the U.S. to contain the rise of China in the technological field out of the zero-sum ideology instead of actual cybersecurity threat. However, it seems that the U.S. has forgotten the intention of 5G is to provide more convenient and efficient communication among people and beyond borders.

Huawei invested five billion RMB in developing 5G technology last year and has signed 30 commercial 5G contracts worldwide, 60 percent of which in Europe according to Bloomberg. The full-series 5G engagement makes it a frontrunner in the market regardless of political attacks from the United States. But it was never a race for Huawei who is collaborating with a variety of different organizations, including operators and vendors, to work toward 5G standardization.

It is unacceptable to take assumption as fact without sound evidence, and groundless to politicize a corporate's behavior. As the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman pointed out on January 29, “the U.S. has been using national power to tarnish and crack down on specific Chinese companies in an attempt to strangle their lawful and legitimate operations. Behind such practices are deep political intentions and manipulations.”

With the friction between China and the U.S. evolves, those assumptions and suspicions with strong political intentions are likely to drag the two sides into a security dilemma, fueling a possible “Tech War” under the zero-sum thinking.

The crux of the China-U.S. friction lies in the different mindsets. While the U.S. is stuck in the zero-sum thinking, China has held high the ideology of positive-sum by proposing the Belt and Road Initiative and the concept of shared future for mankind, in the hope of sharing the fruit of Chinese development with other countries.

Suppressing the development of Chinese high-tech companies is addressing the symptom instead of the cause because no one else can help cure the U.S. paranoid but itself, and there will always be new leading Chinese companies emerging with the rise of China. As for Chinese companies, the only way to break down prejudice is to develop core technology and let competence prove themselves.
 
I don't get what you are trying to say.

Is there something wrong with how the comment is being displayed?
I asked
"which country is using more money on military and war and overall has a smaller economy like the soviets had"
17 minutes ago
huh?
the country from your

"which country is using more money on military and war and overall has a smaller economy like the soviets had"

line 57 minutes ago is:

that country is:
 
noted
US unveils its criminal case against Huawei, alleging China giant stole trade secrets and violated Iran sanctions
Updated 0807 GMT (1607 HKT) January 29, 2019
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The United States has filed criminal charges against Huawei, escalating its fight against the Chinese tech giant and potentially complicating efforts by Washington and Beijing to negotiate an end to their bruising trade war.
The Justice Department on Monday unsealed two cases against Huawei that detail a slew of allegations. One indictment accuses Huawei of trying to steal trade secrets from T-Mobile (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), and of promising bonuses to employees who collected confidential information on competitors. A second indictment claims the company worked to skirt US sanctions on Iran.
The agency also revealed formal charges against Meng Wanzhou, Huawei's chief financial officer. Meng was arrested in Canada in December, and the United States is looking to extradite her.
"Today we are announcing that we are bringing criminal charges against telecommunications giant Huawei and its associates for nearly two dozen alleged crimes," Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker said in a statement. "China must hold its citizens and Chinese companies accountable for complying with the law."
FBI Director Christopher Wray said at a press conference that Huawei "relied on dishonest business practices that contradict the economic principles that have allowed American companies and the United States to thrive."
"The prosperity that drives our economic security is inherently linked to our national security," Wray said. "And the immense influence that the Chinese government holds over Chinese corporations like
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
represents a threat to both."
Huawei said Tuesday it was "disappointed" by the US move to bring charges against it.
"The company denies that it or its subsidiary or affiliate have committed any of the asserted violations of US law set forth in each of the indictments, is not aware of any wrongdoing by Ms. Meng, and believes the US courts will ultimately reach the same conclusion," it said in a statement.
The Chinese government reacted angrily to the charges, accusing the United States of using "its state power to smear and crack down on targeted Chinese companies in an attempt to kill their normal and legal business operations."
"We strongly urge the United States to stop its unreasonable crackdown on Chinese companies, including Huawei," Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said in a statement. He added that the United States should "immediately withdraw its arrest warrant on Ms. Meng and refrain from making a formal extradition request to avoid walking farther down a wrong path."
The charges
A 10-count indictment, which was filed in Washington state, claims that Huawei worked for years to steal T-Mobile's proprietary phone testing technology, known as "Tappy." Huawei supplied phones to T-Mobile, and had access to some information about Tappy because of that relationship.
Huawei was also building its own phone-testing robot in China. Federal prosecutors claim the company repeatedly directed its own employees to gather details about how Tappy worked — a violation of the confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements it had with T-Mobile.
Employees were allegedly asked to send information such as photos, measurements and the serial numbers of various components. One employee was caught stealing one of the robot's arms by placing it in his bag, according to court documents.
US prosecutors say that Huawei then obstructed justice when the T-Mobile, which is based in Washington, threatened to sue it.
Huawei allegedly came up with a false and misleading report about the attempts to steal Tappy technology, in which it blamed rogue employees. At the same time, the company launched a formal bonus program that rewarded employees who stole trade secrets from competitors, according to the indictment.
The government also unsealed a 13-count indictment against Huawei and Meng in Brooklyn federal court. That document details an alleged scheme by Huawei to deceive financial institutions and the US government about its business in Iran.
According to the indictment, the deception goes back to mid-2007, when Huawei's founder,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, falsely told the FBI that the company did not violate any US export laws, and that it had not dealt directly with any Iranian company.
The company and Meng are also said to have claimed that an affiliate, Skycom, was a separate company in order to conduct business in the country, when in fact it was a subsidiary.
US officials claim that more deceptive statements followed a series of Reuters articles detailing Huawei's control of Skycom.
The indictment details an episode in 2013 when Meng is said to have made false claims at a meeting with one of Huawei's banks. Though it's not named in court documents, Meng's lawyer previously identified the bank as HSBC (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
).
Meng walked through a PowerPoint presentation in Chinese, according to the indictment. A translation later sent to the bank allegedly included "numerous misrepresentations," such as a claim that Huawei's work with Skycom consisted of "normal business cooperation."
HSBC is said to have cleared more than $100 million in Skycom transactions that traveled through the United States between 2010 and 2014 before ending the relationship around 2017.
Meng has denied any wrongdoing. Huawei said Tuesday that it had attempted to discuss the case with the US Justice Department after her arrest in December but that "the request was rejected without explanation."
In response to a request for comment, HSBC said that "the US Department of Justice has confirmed that HSBC is not under investigation in this case."
Huawei under fire
The charges from the United States increase pressure on Huawei, one of China's tech champions and a crucial part of the country's efforts to take a key role in the rollout of superfast 5G wireless networks.
The United States has said for years that Huawei poses a potential national security threat. But government efforts to rein in alleged abuses by the company have escalated in recent months.
Meng's arrest in December set off a geopolitical firestorm and has strained relations between the US, Canada and China. China has repeatedly called the detention of Meng, who was
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a political move.
But the United States on Monday reiterated its intention to move forward with the extradition process. Meng is due back in court again in Canada on February 6.
Congress is also considering legislation that would ban the sale of US parts to any Chinese telecom firm that has violated US export control laws or sanctions, a measure that expressly targets Huawei.
"It has been clear for some time that Huawei poses a threat to our national security, and I applaud the Trump administration for taking steps to finally hold the company accountable," Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat, said in a statement Monday.
Importantly, the charges come as the United States and China are racing to cut a deal on trade before March 1, when US tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods will otherwise rise to 25% from 10%. Vice Premier Liu He is scheduled to travel to the United States for two days of talks starting Wednesday.
It's not clear how Monday's announcement will factor into negotiations. President Donald Trump previously suggested that he may intervene in the Meng case if it would help reach a trade deal with China.
Huawei is under fire in other parts of the world, too.
Earlier this month, a Huawei executive was arrested in Poland on charges of spying for China. The company has since
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. And Germany and other European countries are reportedly considering barring Huawei equipment from the country's 5G networks. The company is already banned from supplying 5G equipment to Australia and New Zealand.
 

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
I asked
"which country is using more money on military and war and overall has a smaller economy like the soviets had"
17 minutes ago


that country is:

You could look it up.

It’s the country with 20 trillion gdp ppp as opposed to 25 but spends 3.6% of it’s gdp on the army, which has been in constant war for like 50 years. The name of whose leader does NOT start with X and end with i
 

localizer

Colonel
Registered Member
well if they start arresting
You could look it up.

It’s the country with 20 trillion gdp ppp as opposed to 25 but spends 3.6% of it’s gdp on the army, which has been in constant war for like 50 years. The name of whose leader does NOT start with X and end with i

give it another... 10 years
 

hkbc

Junior Member
Doesn't trade secret disputes belong to civil court?

Civil, Criminal, Kangaroo does it really matter?? Because this is all a legal issue, right :rolleyes: They should just go the whole hog, re-enact the Chinese Exclusion Act, repeal the Civil Rights Act, dust down Executive Order 9066 and do a replace all of Japanese for Chinese in it and sign it!

There problem fixed and it would be all perfectly "Legal" within these United States of America

What those Commies don't recognise our laws well they should!

American Justice 101 for you!
 
LOL! a contrived post:
You could look it up.

It’s the country with 20 trillion gdp ppp as opposed to 25 but spends 3.6% of it’s gdp on the army, which has been in constant war for like 50 years. The name of whose leader does NOT start with X and end with i

but let's go one page back:

#3497 styx, Today at 1:09 PM
suggested China should act as the U. S. S. R.,

so I pointed out Today at 1:27 PM the U. S. S. R. hadn't ended up well,

and your response was
#3499 Biscuits, Today at 1:46 PM
"Remember which country is using more money on military and war and overall has a smaller economy like the soviets had..."

what do you mean in this context?
which country is that? (spending more on military and with the economy smaller than that of the U. S. S. R.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top