Not just Apple of course - Qualcomm was hit with an antitrust investigation by Chinese regulators, and they fined quite heavily. This is why Huawei is fast building up its patent portfolio in 5G.
Trade War with China
- Thread starter Ultra
- Start date
- Status
Not just Apple of course - Qualcomm was hit with an antitrust investigation by Chinese regulators, and they fined quite heavily. This is why Huawei is fast building up its patent portfolio in 5G.
I guess expect return of a full blown rhetorical trade war again soon after midterm election on Tuesday.
China looks like glutton for punishment. trump recent boasting of imminent China trade deal is solely to use China to boost the market to survive mid term, yet China plays along with Trump. It's going nowhere.
Doesn't China want Trump lose the mid term? What's going on here??
Mind boggling on China part. China desperate for goodwill even fake one it still fell for it. I mean even US market and analysts do not trust this thing, I don't know what to say to that
Doesn't China want Trump lose the mid term? What's going on here??
Mind boggling on China part. China desperate for goodwill even fake one it still fell for it. I mean even US market and analysts do not trust this thing, I don't know what to say to that
How is China playing along with Trump? All China is saying is what it said a million times already: we won't negotiate except as equals, we aren't afraid of a trade war, etc. To me it's clear that China has completely written off this administration and is just waiting it out as it moves along with MiC2025 and technological independence.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Why do you think China wants Trump to lose the midterms? So his power will be reduced and so people who are smarter with more experience can stop him from making mistakes? So those people can step up and play the good cop to all the countries that Trump has alienated? Swinging while charging forward is not the only strategy to a fight.
Believe it: the Chinese government isn't more gullible than you and they're not more ignorant about American politics than you. Let them come up with the strategy.
US calling China as biggest intellectual theft. Well, to be honest, Whatever US claims China stolen is pretty useless or insignificant , makes no impact to the country!
Those individual Chinese taking something from US and bring back trying to make some big bucks. Alot of them brought back are Junks.
And here are those going back to China to cheat university grant and government money. The famous one is
Shanghai Jiaotong University Chen Jin faking Motorola chip as self developed.
So, I dispute US claims China as the biggest intellectual theft because whatever taken are pretty much useless.
Those individual Chinese taking something from US and bring back trying to make some big bucks. Alot of them brought back are Junks.
And here are those going back to China to cheat university grant and government money. The famous one is
Shanghai Jiaotong University Chen Jin faking Motorola chip as self developed.
So, I dispute US claims China as the biggest intellectual theft because whatever taken are pretty much useless.
Last edited:
Contrary to Wisdom man of this forum, influential Peking university professors suggesting appeasing US and criticize China industrial Policy.
Ho ho ho... what do you know!?
In the past three weeks, Zhang Weiying, and a professor at the prestigious seat of learning in Beijing, has mapped out his vision of the future.
On Monday, Fan Gang, another influential professor at Peking University and president of the , outlined a similar roadmap.
Their views come at a time when the world’s second-largest economy is being buffeted by internal and external headwinds, including rising trade tensions with the United States.
Zhang has attributed the Cold War-style stand-off between Beijing and Washington to China’s flawed economic model.
Ho ho ho... what do you know!?
In the past three weeks, Zhang Weiying, and a professor at the prestigious seat of learning in Beijing, has mapped out his vision of the future.
On Monday, Fan Gang, another influential professor at Peking University and president of the , outlined a similar roadmap.
Their views come at a time when the world’s second-largest economy is being buffeted by internal and external headwinds, including rising trade tensions with the United States.
Zhang has attributed the Cold War-style stand-off between Beijing and Washington to China’s flawed economic model.
Even if the Chinese open up their economy further it will only work in the short or mid term. In the long term the USA will want concessions which will harm China's economic growth or could even harm their social cohesion. That's not to say that I think it is a bad idea to open up the markets further at this juncture. I also know Peking University is Xi's alma mater so these people might actually have some sway over his opinion. But the Chinese must work under their own model and not break to USA pressure like the Soviet Union did. China has used the experience of Japan and South Korea's economies as templates for their future development in the past. The Chinese might have achieved the critical mass to compete in the wider market but I think they should remain beware of the experience Japan went through in the late 1980s.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
First of all, many prominent American economists have also expressed that the US cannot win a trade war against China. Why focus on these 2 people?
Secondly, what is your point? What is this ho ho ho crap? You got nothing right over anyone else. Do you even know what you are saying? First you criticize China for being too soft, appeasing too much looking for a win-win when one cannot happen. Then, you quote these articles that advocate the exact opposite of what you suggested, and you add ho ho ho??!! What the hell are you talking about? You don't even have a consistent stance; you just want to complain and criticize others no matter what happens.
Last edited:
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
People talk as if the US has legitimate gripes against Chinese behavior on trade. That would be true if China didn't have legitimate gripes about the US. Everything complained about China Trump says US allies are just as bad. Do you see anyone telling how US allies are on the path to nowhere? The US complains about trade deficits yet has restrictions on selling to China technology they can't produced or cost more to do it themselves. Meaning the only things that China can buy from the US is stuff China can make for themselves and at a cheaper cost. The trade deficit is of the US's own making. The US is on the path of unreasonable expectations. The lesson learned is not about playing fair. It's having the advantage over the other. The truth is the US and its corporations take advantage of cheap labor in China so they can make more money than they would any place else. Outsourcing is misrepresented in US trade figures. China doesn't profit from over 60% of products exported to the US that are sold to consumers. Trump is not calling for reducing trade with China to balance trade. He demands China buy more from the US to make up for a fictional trade deficit meaning the US makes more off a lie. The laws of supply and demand are capitalist principles. Trump demands China buy stuff Chinese don't need. If the US is too afraid of selling technology to China they won't be able to control what China does with it, that's the US's problem. Not China's. They want to have it both ways. Now they not only want to prevent China from having that technology. They expect China to commit to not developing it for themselves either. Yes and let's not forget they accuse slave labor yet fully exploit it for themselves.
- Status