Correction on this post. Actually a Belarussian tank. Looks like Belarus is doing some practical preparations for an upcoming campaign.RussianT-72 tank with a burner mounted behind it. Was this posted before? Anyway, I thought this was a pretty crude but interesting way of messing with the infrared imaging system of Anti-tank missiles.
View attachment 100418
Yea I'm not sure how much it'll help for missiles with active IR. Not an expert in this so perhaps someone else can chime in. It may be one of those things that can only be learnt on the battlefield.During the Falklands War, Argentine artillerymen tried to divert British infra-red SONs from their guns by building fires off to the side. It didn't help much in the end.
I think 30mm fire would tear the boat apart.I think that was 30mm cannon fire. The boat took several hits and had noticeably slowed down by the end of the video.
Those Slovenian T-55s have the 105mm L7 gun. They also have laser rangefinders. But that gun is still worse than the smoothbore on the T-62. Iraqi T-62s easily destroyed Iranian Chieftains in the Iran-Iraq War. And then there is the whole logistics issue of putting yet another tank into service with its own ammo no other tank Ukraine has will use. But the biggest deal breaker I think is that these are just going to be 28 tanks. At Ukraine's tank loss rate they won't last 3 days.T-55 for Ukraine confirmed.
I imagine in a T-55 vs T-62 situation they will be at a disadvantage? I recall PLA did a lot of testing with that one captured T-62 against Type 59 and concluded it was much superior.
Most wheeled assault gun have a 105mm gun without autoloader: B1 Centauro, AMX-10 RC, Type 11 etc. Surely they can't be all wrong.Yeah, the 105mm gun and no autoloader could be sort of a litmus test. It is in a way a transitional tank. If it goes ok from the training/logistics side, then Ukraine might start getting a whole bunch of older NATO tanks with 105mm guns.
It is a way of training the Ukrainians with 4 man tank crews though...