One possible answer: they only announced it now because it’s no longer valid information.
The War in the Ukraine
- Thread starter SampanViking
- Start date
One possible answer: they only announced it now because it’s no longer valid information.
LMAO another 5D chess move from Russia.
Russia is resuming participation in the "Black Sea grain initiative" after the terrorist attack in Sevastopol from Ukraine-Russia Mod
Zelensky has again showed us how much of a clown he is by making such a big joke out of Putin.
So Russia's reflex to being attacked is to turn the other cheek.
The message that this gives to NATO now is that the harder Russia is hit the more willing Russia is to compromise.
Russia is resuming participation in the "Black Sea grain initiative" after the terrorist attack in Sevastopol from Ukraine-Russia Mod
Zelensky has again showed us how much of a clown he is by making such a big joke out of Putin.
So Russia's reflex to being attacked is to turn the other cheek.
The message that this gives to NATO now is that the harder Russia is hit the more willing Russia is to compromise.
Well this is new, Russian fighters actually doing CAS now.
It is probably related to the agreement Turkey and Russia have about the former cutting aid to Ukraine in exchange for the grain deal. Who knows what the Turks might have compromised in return for keeping the deal on, as well.
They really have a death wish.
Nothing they strike is worth the huge risk they take of getting shot down.
Dumb tactics
Shame that up to now there is not really any evidence that Russia was actually "hit" let alone "hit hard"
It did however get to see the opponents cards, and fully understands it needs to work diligently to defend against such threats.
If nobody died, nothing was lost, then it's a great training opportunity and learning experience for the Russians
Alas, never miss an opportunity to throw in some doom and gloom propaganda to try and convince people that Ukraine is winning. Every extra hyrvnia paid per post matters
Yeah but if they don't do incredibly dangerous manuveres within visual range, people online will accuse them of being missing in action (Well they are, but not because of a lack of videos). There are simply very few countries that are actually capable of fighting a modern air war at a sustained high tempo.
Seems like UAVs and long ranged cruise missiles is doing all the hard yards here compared to airforce strike assets.
So because Ukraine's attack only damaged Russia's ships but failed to sink them that means Russia should just let bygones be bygones and continue on with the grain deal? perhaps till they sink another ship like what they did to the Moskva?
If Mexico attacked an American base on US mainland what do you think the US response would be? Do you think they would enter into negotiations with Mexico to ensure that Mexico's exports continue without any issues as long as Mexico promises not to attack them again? or do you think the US would reduce Mexico to ash to make an example out of them.
It's not really worth responding to this post, but I might as well.
The USA and Mexico are not at war, and have good relations. It would probably be swept under the rug and blamed on cartel fighting. And no, they wouldn't turn Mexico into ash.
Russia is at war with Ukraine, and is currently helping them decommunise by destroying the infrastructure built by the hands of the communist labour from the Soviet Union. Pretty damn helpful if you ask me, they should be thankful for it since the Bandera folks in power hate everything to do with what actually built that country.
What should they do exactly in your expert opinion? Starve innocent people in other countries because of some failed Ukrainian terrorist attack, should they nuke the entire world because of it, should they carry on procedurally and logically with their mission and save such a massive escalation for when it's actually necessary? I think the last option is the wise and pragmatic choice
Could you provide evidence for this damage to Russian ships? I havent found anything thus far and have been trying for several days
As for Moskva there is still no concrete evidence proving that Ukrainians actually sank that ship. All I'm seeing here is cheap regurgitated propaganda comming from you
Last edited:
Also in regards to my previous comment, lets consider when Iran struck a US military base in Iraq with missiles, did the USA make an example of Iran by turning it to ash? Did they use force at all? How about the USS Cole attack? Or USS stark? USS Liberty? The answer is they didn't apply any force for these attacks at all so using the US as an example of what Russia should be doing is self defeating to your own argument
Let people who conduct state craft on a global stage conduct their state craft, and we can talk about how it works, and who is good and who is evil
Let people who conduct state craft on a global stage conduct their state craft, and we can talk about how it works, and who is good and who is evil