a Sad SAM's decided to turn back to its launching point. Probably a Buk.
West of Dnepr river(except Nikolaev and Odessa) are also pointless from economic point of view. It is all poor regions of Ukraine that have minimal export.Russia will definitely face a guerrilla war in most of Ukraine west of the Dnieper River if it tries to occupy it. Even the Sumy and Chernihiv Oblasts, east of the River, have proven to be very hostile territory to Russia. I believe that Russia wants to avoid that...
It is third time Russia return control of Ukraine. And both previous time it was splited in two steps. With first being Eastern Ukrainian regions.To suggest Russia has no interest in taking the western Ukrainian provinces because they are poor and of limited economic worth is just the flip side of the Reddit level arguments that China only cares about Taiwan because of its economic value.
The only time in modern military history where a major power has committed itself fully to a war and not finished the job is during the Korean War, where both sides ground each other into an unbreakable stalemate.
If Ukraine's best soldiers are all in Donbas, why aren't the Russians attacking on a different front? Surely it would be better to take Zaporizhzhia than continue the fighting in the Donbas?Not sure how on earth the rest of the army in Ukraine is going to be able to defend the rest of Ukraine if the best soldiers of Ukraine that are trapped in the listschansk and severodonetsk cauldron are basically destroyed. Ukraine only have so many soldiers to use and experience cannot be 3d printed so really if Ukraine loses here, well the rest of Ukraine will eventually belong to Russia and the west (in particular the USA) will have a debacle that is many times worse then Afghanistan. How many tons of weapons have made it to Ukrainian hands exactly?
Exactly, Ukrainians have free movement and the right to work in the EU. This will be impossible to revoke. Only very few people will choose to fight an insurgency when they can live a good life in a rich country that welcomes them.Drive all the hostile population progressively west and out of Ukrainian and the insurgency problem basically solves itself.
It is just the angle that makes it look like that. It didn't turn back to the launching point, but rather left and down and hit somewhere towards the cameraman.a Sad SAM's decided to turn back to its launching point. Probably a Buk.
Minimal Export rn, but large Coal and uranium deposits right north of nikkolaev oblast.West of Dnepr river(except Nikolaev and Odessa) are also pointless from economic point of view. It is all poor regions of Ukraine that have minimal export.
You yourself are making assumptions. While I do not subscribe to the opinion of those who say that Russia is not interested in taking over Western Ukraine because of its lack of economic utility, I do indeed believe that the Russians wouldn't want to take over Western Ukraine because of the certainly very hostile population and also because of the additional logistical efforts and even strain that will entail for it to occupy that part of the country.It’s always shallow and nonsensical to try to add a price tag to geopolitical issues, especially ones considered to be of potentially existential level security concerns.
To suggest Russia has no interest in taking the western Ukrainian provinces because they are poor and of limited economic worth is just the flip side of the Reddit level arguments that China only cares about Taiwan because of its economic value.
The only time in modern military history where a major power has committed itself fully to a war and not finished the job is during the Korean War, where both sides ground each other into an unbreakable stalemate.
There is currently zero prospects of the Ukrainian military achieving the same feat against the Russians, and the west has already thrown even its sanctions kitchen sink at Russia, so just why would Russia just suddenly stop all by itself?
This self delusional wishful thinking about Russia just stopping instead of taking all the marbles when they are up for grabs is the true cause of endless western ‘intelligence’ obsessions about Russia running out of war supplies from shells to missiles to men to tanks. There is no real indication that Russia is running out of anything it needs for the war effort, but the desire for such copium reports are so strong that of course you are going to get people stepping up and providing intelligence assessments to say just that when there is so much to be gained from doing so personally and basically no downside to being wrong.
Sure, there will be an insurgency issue after the war, but that’s a problem for after the war. And as I have said before, I think Russia will change how it conducts itself during the latter phases of the war, once they are deep in hostile territory, that will probably vastly mitigate this potential insurgency threat while also massively increasing the costs for NATO and the EU.
Basically, expect them to take the gloves off when the Ukrainian military holes up in population centres in areas that are overwhelmingly anti-Russian. They will do so consistently and maybe even deliberately by trapping Ukrainian military forces in population centres to give them the pretext needed to bomb and shell those population centres off the map. Drive all the hostile population progressively west and out of Ukrainian and the insurgency problem basically solves itself.