With all the attention focused on Donbas and Kherson, the Ukrainians have made a dramatic blitz advance on the Kharkov front in the past 48 hours (advance is 32km in that time).
With the capture of Staryi Saltiv, the Ukrainians are now within artillery range (from the west) of the rail line from Belgorod to Izyum. If that is cut off, the Russian troops in Izyum risk being cut off and encircled from their flank to the north. Ironically despite all the talk of the Ukrainians being encircled, it may be the Russians who find themselves suddenly encircled. I made reference to this when the Russians originally withdrew from the north. I said they needed to defend three fronts- Kherson, Donbas, and Kharkov.
They did ok with Kherson and Donbas so far but have been getting massacred near Kharkov. To save their position they probably need to halt their Donbas offensive to reinforce the Kharkov front.
the word significant you need to put in context. we are now now over 2.5 months into it. we have few videos of drone excluding any Moskova video. drones are for videos and most of them not even colored.. it will be like Pilot making video of every sortie.Russia has suffered significant lost in Ukraine to drones
The statement said: “High-precision Onyx missiles hit a logistics center at a military airport in the Odessa area through which foreign weapons were being transported.
The unmanned Bayraktar TB2 drone, as well as missile and ammunition hangers from the United States and European countries, were destroyed.
This already goes towards conspiracy theories.what if Russian deliberately not wanted to shot down these drones to see where these drones are going back and than send cruise missiles at them and do much much higher damage to human lives that support airforce.
its logical thinking not conspiracy theory to find out hideouts of drones and destroy much higher skilled human capital.This already goes towards conspiracy theories.
Simply even slow drones can execute all the same methods to evade detection and intercept "big" aircraft can. And do it with success.
long-neglected loitering aircraft(not only unmanned, by the way!) just made a loud return, for those who thought that 3rd world conflicts weren't indicative enough.
There are many thousands "speed of action" craft in the world. There are no less than a thousand in action over Ukraine right now.it will take some time for people to realize that speed of action very important.
You're asking too much from a <700kg plane.it does not carry rockets, machines guns and bunker busting strike weopons.
any small drone can loiter over the area that will not draw attention.There are many thousands "speed of action" craft in the world. There are no less than a thousand in action over Ukraine right now.
Yet the ones that are lacking are precisely those that can see from high up for tens of hours. And those that can wait for their chance for the same tens of hours.
there more fixed wing aircraft than needed. what can MALE/ HALE drone do that so many other high speed deep penetrating weopons cannot do?.Russia, for example, does probably lack fixed-wing aircraft, as VKS have really proven themselves to be just too small(at least their flying part). But it lacks MALE and HALE drones much, MUCH more, as there are literally just a few dozens of them.
the problem is that maintaining, operating, loading (fuel/weopons) this 700KG plane can draw attention to activity.You're asking too much from a <700kg plane.
Other drones can, there is no written rule that prohibits drones from having more payload.
Russia has suffered significant lost in Ukraine to drones; however, the recent lost of two patrol boats proves that they haven't learnt. I just wonder it is so difficult to defend against attacks from drones?
Glad to see the thread back.
Over the last two weeks or so I keep seeing on pro-Russia social media that there are instances of Ukrainian forces selling their western equipment to DNR/LNR militia for cash. A particular instance says the price for a whole armour vehicle was negotiated on USD basis but then militia handed over a stack of rubles for payment. When the Ukrainians complained that rubles is not legal tender here the militias replied "oh don't worry, it will be soon" and then the deal was made.
Is there any basis for such rumour? It would go somewhat to explain the extreme amount of gear Ukrainians are apparently going through.
It's also curious if people are welling to accept rubles outside of Donbas and Kherson currently under Russian control. Surely if you show people a big stash of rubles you are liable to be arrested by SBU for suspected treason.