If you are interested in what Westerners are being told about equipment in Ukraine, watch the following video:
I learned several valuable things:
-The "Soviet" tanks Russia deploys in Ukraine lack thermal sights, except for the T-80U commanders' model.
(b/c the Soviet Union had difficulty producing thermals.)
-Similarly, Soviet Union did not field many tanks with laser rangefinders. Correspondingly, there are few models of Russian tanks with laser rangefinding.
-Abrams gun stabilization and targeting is in a class above any deployed Russian tank, as it can reliably hit targets at 2.5 km.
Boy, those T-90s are not going to know what hit them!
Also, NATO standardization means that Challenger, Leopard, and Abrams can all share the same main gun ammunition.
(Mods, I apologize if I am inadvertently posting a banned source. It is for educational purposes.)
Really, the whole thing reads as if the presenter picked up a 30-year-old book about Soviet armour, and transposed it to the Russian armoured force of today. There's no mention of the Thales thermals that have been applied to Russian armour for years now, how the main-force T72B3/M and T-80BVM use thermals, how the T-90M uses thermals, how many of the older tanks pushed into service have been outfitted with thermals.
Soviet tanks employed laser rangefinding decades ago, even outfitting T-62M with them.
And of course he can't event describe NATO equipment properly, since Challenger 2 uses different ammunition for its rifled gun.
It's noteworthy that viewers largely believe what they're being fed. One of the reasons why the West keeps pushing arms into Ukraine, as the public was convinced Russia was about to crack any day now.