MOD EDIT: Added spoiler tag for visible casualties in linked media
"Russian" car bomb on the Crimean bridge?
"Russian" car bomb on the Crimean bridge?
Last edited by a moderator:
If the rail line is still intact this would be less disruptive than last time
Wagner only withdrew from Bakhmut beginning of June, a single month of taking operational command of Bakhmut and he is already gotten the boot? That front haven't collapsed and is unlikely to change hands any time soon, what mistakes could he have committed in such a short time to be relieved of command?What are you talking about? How is the constant firing or replacing of Russian generals a bad thing operationally? If the strategy is essentially the same. Tactics change but strategy remains and you must know this if am to assume you served or well-read on the military, especially American. As a matter of fact, during WWII American Generalship was constantly in Flux as commanding generals are fired, replaced, rotated as documented by Tom Ricks on his book on precisely the same title: American Generalship. He in fact argued that the piss poor performance of the American Army generals in Iraq is an institutional failure from failing to hold their generals accountable i.e. Firing or replacing them. Lt.Col. Yingling wrote a scathing op-ed piece in the NYT regarding the low quality of American Generalship and holding them accountable in his words, a private who drops his rifle has a better chance of getting punished than their Generals from failing to craft a winning strategy.
I understand am delving way off topic here, but I want to have an answer from the above posters charge and accusation (the supposed instability of firing generals) without any challenge as if it were a fact.
If the rail line is still intact this would be less disruptive than last time
It looks a lot less severe than the previous time
Train going pass the damaged section, giving us a look at the extent of the damage and proving rail bridge is still operating.