What message is Zelenskyy going for here? Aid right now or I'll surrender?
NATO doesnt have much room left for giving help unless they start making new weapons and put factories to work at 110% just look at how painfully slow Leo transfers are, many of these package systems are in fact, not from stock but in use gear.What message is Zelenskyy going for here? Aid right now or I'll surrender?
If they are doing that it's a good deal. The troops inside them are still in a worst situation than newer tanks but if they stay far enough in support it will not be so bad for them.The thing I see most tanks do in the war is to bust fortifications and act as secondary artillery. If that's what you do, a T-55 would do the job equally as a T-62, T-72, T-80 and T-90 with better indirect range. If that's the job you do while under threat of ATGMs, drones and artillery, a T-55 would be a more efficient and expendable choice. If you are considering some kind of military confrontation with NATO directly, you might as well save the modernized T-72s, T-80s and T-90s for that, and use the T-55s for these infantry and assault support roles. NATO is saving their best tanks too and only throwing seconds to Ukraine so they are thinking of the same thing from the other side. The main reason I would only put a modern tank for this conflict is for battle testing it.
Also mentions the T-62 which has an odd caliber. Given the huge number of T-55s built, it would have an enormous advantage over the T-62 when it comes to parts and ammunition supply.
Or simply, the rumour of Russia starting to reactivate and deploy its T-54/55s are simply a misinformation.In terms of parts there is hardly any difference, the T-62 and T-55 use mostly the same automotive components. If you have parts for one, you have parts for the other. The T-72 shares a fair amount as well FWIW. Not sure why 100mm D-10T ammunition should be more or less abundant than that for the 115mm U-5TS. Both tanks are in service in large numbers around the world, and as I've mentioned before, Russia had no problems supplying Syria with T-62s and ammunition during the civil war there (or Libya in 2020).
I find it curious that they are dragging old T-54s and un-upgraded T-55As out of storage. Surely a newer T-55AM or T-55MV with all the applique armour and upgraded systems would be a better option? Are they maybe going for a deep upgrade, or are they conversion candidates for recovery vehicles and heavy APCs/urban combat vehicles? I'm also wondering if maybe the reactivation of T-55s is maybe related to Russia having a bunch of production lines sitting around that were never refitted to handle newer tanks?
I find it all pretty puzzling, and I am not buying the idea that they simply ran out of T-72s and T-62s to reactivate, because they are seemingly also spitting those out of the factories as fast as they can, and it doesn't explain why you take the oldest T-54/T-55s you can find. Even as dug-in artillery, a T-55AMV is still preferable over a vanilla T-54, or am I missing something?
What do you think about that? hahahaI find it curious that they are dragging old T-54s and un-upgraded T-55As out of storage.
If the automotive components are the same, could they be disassembling for parts to speed up repair of other models?In terms of parts there is hardly any difference, the T-62 and T-55 use mostly the same automotive components. If you have parts for one, you have parts for the other. The T-72 shares a fair amount as well FWIW. Not sure why 100mm D-10T ammunition should be more or less abundant than that for the 115mm U-5TS. Both tanks are in service in large numbers around the world, and as I've mentioned before, Russia had no problems supplying Syria with T-62s and ammunition during the civil war there (or Libya in 2020).
I find it curious that they are dragging old T-54s and un-upgraded T-55As out of storage. Surely a newer T-55AM or T-55MV with all the applique armour and upgraded systems would be a better option? Are they maybe going for a deep upgrade, or are they conversion candidates for recovery vehicles and heavy APCs/urban combat vehicles? I'm also wondering if maybe the reactivation of T-55s is maybe related to Russia having a bunch of production lines sitting around that were never refitted to handle newer tanks?
I find it all pretty puzzling, and I am not buying the idea that they simply ran out of T-72s and T-62s to reactivate, because they are seemingly also spitting those out of the factories as fast as they can, and it doesn't explain why you take the oldest T-54/T-55s you can find. Even as dug-in artillery, a T-55AMV is still preferable over a vanilla T-54, or am I missing something?
Is it for sure kontakt 1 and not Ukraine's indigenous ERA?