A negotiated settlement could mean anything. Getting Zelensky to sign on the dotted line at gunpoint could be technically a negotiated settlement.Yes? Putin thinks all armed conflicts end on the negotiation table one way or another.
So no, Putin does not believe in endless protracted war of attrition to induce "collapse" (whatever this means), he is still aiming for a negotiated settlement and war of limited objectives. I predict the moment Donbass is liberated, he will unilaterally declare an end to S.M.O. and mobilization, and transition to a low-level intensity conflict while trying to negotiate a ceasefire.
I think everybody including me thought Ukraine or the eastern side would fall quickly but day 3 of the war I knew something was wrong with Russian military and it has been downhill from there. A perceived superpower, at least when it comes to ground forces, has been force to fight a WW1/WW2 style of war... yikes.You can’t expect Russia to make sense at this point. People used to believe they would eliminate the entire ukr military in a week at the beginning. Now however we still see footage of ukr frogfoots and mig-29s. They don’t seem to have the logistical capability that the US had during the gulf or iraq, they can’t fight a war well, even next door.
Yes? Putin thinks all armed conflicts end on the negotiation table one way or another.
So no, Putin does not believe in endless protracted war of attrition to induce "collapse" (whatever this means), he is still aiming for a negotiated settlement and war of limited objectives. I predict the moment Donbass is liberated, he will unilaterally declare an end to S.M.O. and mobilization, and transition to a low-level intensity conflict while trying to negotiate a ceasefire.
Do you think peace in Ukraine is possible within a reasonable time?
«The prospects for peace are difficult even if a lot has changed in the last period: the channels of communication are much more open and China seems to be more present in the construction of a negotiation
You are correct.... technically, even 'Unconditional Surrender' is a negotiated settlement. That being said, I highly doubt Russia would force 'unconditional surrender' upon Zelensky, and not annex the entire country. This isn't like US where they force Japan to re-write their Constitution, then leave a puppet regime and a military base. Putin is going to stay in Ukraine forever, he already said the dissolution of Soviet Union was a mistake and Ukraine is an aberration of history. Putin would be insane to allow NATO to rearm Ukraine into Israel 2.0 after conflict subsides, and only permanent occupation of Ukraine would permanently crippled their ability to wage further war. So 'unconditional surrender' is tantamount to annexation of whole country, which I doubt Putin will go for.A negotiated settlement could mean anything. Getting Zelensky to sign on the dotted line at gunpoint could be technically a negotiated settlement.
Russia withdrew from Kiev, Kharkiv, Kherson to concentrate on Donbass front, so yes, Donbass is still the original objective. Also, Russia evacuated from Kherson city, which is the regional capital of Kherson Oblast, so annexation claims are flexible.If Putin was only interested in the Donbass Russian advances would be a lot more aggressive now. He also wouldn't declare the annexation of the Kherson Oblast. Russia seems prepared to drag this war out as long as it takes to achieve its objectives.
Russians are starting to lose ground in Bakhmut.
Pretty much what I think. But I don't think Putin or Russians in general will be fussed that Ukrainians control Ukraine, as long as they aren't Nazis or pro NATO.You are correct.... technically, even 'Unconditional Surrender' is a negotiated settlement. That being said, I highly doubt Russia would force 'unconditional surrender' upon Zelensky, and not annex the entire country. This isn't like US where they force Japan to re-write their Constitution, then leave a puppet regime and a military base. Putin is going to stay in Ukraine forever, he already said the dissolution of Soviet Union was a mistake and Ukraine is an aberration of history. Putin would be insane to allow NATO to rearm Ukraine into Israel 2.0 after conflict subsides, and only permanent occupation of Ukraine would permanently crippled their ability to wage further war. So 'unconditional surrender' is tantamount to annexation of whole country, which I doubt Putin will go for.
Whether correct or not, the withdrawal from Kherson, Kiev, etc was a military decision. In the case of Kherson wasn't accompanied by the renouncement in claim on the city. I think Russians have every intention of retaking the Kherson when they deem it favourable.Russia withdrew from Kiev, Kharkiv, Kherson to concentrate on Donbass front, so yes, Donbass is still the original objective. Also, Russia evacuated from Kherson city, which is the regional capital of Kherson Oblast, so annexation claims are flexible.
I think everybody including me thought Ukraine or the eastern side would fall quickly but day 3 of the war I knew something was wrong with Russian military and it has been downhill from there. A perceived superpower, at least when it comes to ground forces, has been force to fight a WW1/WW2 style of war... yikes.
Kiev can only keep fighting Russia as long as it gets American weapons, the Hungarian prime minister says.
The prospects of ending the Ukraine-Russia conflict are in the hands of the US, which is Kiev’s main backer, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has said.
“Ukraine can only fight as long as the US supports it with money and weapons,” Orban insisted in an interview with the Magyar Nemzet newspaper on Saturday.
“If Americans want peace, there will be peace,” Viktor Orban stressed.