Re: World News Thread & Breaking News!!
So, let me school you a bit on well known history. When then those colonists were faced with abject tyranny, forcing them to keep foreign soldiers in their own homes to help rule over them, being taxed into oblivion at the time, having their own children pressed into naval service for "his majesty," whether they wanted to or not, having no true representation for their grievances, etc., etc. they first tried for ten years to settle things through the King and the British Parliament...but were given no relief and instead were given even harsher treatment.
Then, when the King finally decided to confiscate their weapons, from a people living on the edge of a wilderness...they resisted and a war ensured.
So it was either fight, or be enslaved even more harshly.
The person(s) who entered "guns" into the equation at the time was the English King and his servants, so if you think as a result that the United States "created" democracy out of the barrel of a gun, you are free to believe what you want, but that belief has nothing to do with reality. They defended themselves.
Oh Bravo Sierra, airsuperiority. That's just hogwash. Why take a simple saying, which was mis-quoted anyway because it is "Freedom is not Free," which means people have to sarcifice and sometimes fight and die to DEFEND it, not impose it...as I say, why take a simple saying and turn it into this political, anti-American kaka?Maybe because their democracy grew out of the barrel of a gun, so when they export it that's the only delivery option available.
So, let me school you a bit on well known history. When then those colonists were faced with abject tyranny, forcing them to keep foreign soldiers in their own homes to help rule over them, being taxed into oblivion at the time, having their own children pressed into naval service for "his majesty," whether they wanted to or not, having no true representation for their grievances, etc., etc. they first tried for ten years to settle things through the King and the British Parliament...but were given no relief and instead were given even harsher treatment.
Then, when the King finally decided to confiscate their weapons, from a people living on the edge of a wilderness...they resisted and a war ensured.
So it was either fight, or be enslaved even more harshly.
The person(s) who entered "guns" into the equation at the time was the English King and his servants, so if you think as a result that the United States "created" democracy out of the barrel of a gun, you are free to believe what you want, but that belief has nothing to do with reality. They defended themselves.
Last edited: