The PLAN LCAC Type 726 Yuyi Class

Hendrik_2000 said:

Show me a picture with 4 Yuyi in LPD then I will retract my post! Until then stop spreading the lie that Yuyi can only have 1/3 load of US LCAC
the burden of proof is on you and not keep mouthing ad nauseum your own prejudice and bias

Click to expand...

Are you trying to claim that 4 Yuyi CANNOT fit into the 071? This is something we have known for a very long time, almost as long as we have known about the 071, but in your humorously vain attempt to validate your fake fanboi CGI you are now willing to ignore well-established features of the 071. As for the load of the Yuyi vs the LCAC, we are talking single column vs 3 columns to load vehicles. The tracks on the Yuyi's deck and the placement of the ramp hoists and air vents make this very obvious. All you have is wishful fanboi desires that you cannot validate in any way, shape, or form.

Iron Man said:

Are you trying to claim that 4 Yuyi CANNOT fit into the 071? This is something we have known for a very long time, almost as long as we have known about the 071, but in your humorously vain attempt to validate your fake fanboi CGI you are now willing to ignore well-established features of the 071. As for the load of the Yuyi vs the LCAC, we are talking single column vs 3 columns to load vehicles. The tracks on the Yuyi's deck and the placement of the ramp hoists and air vents make this very obvious. All you have is wishful fanboi desires that you cannot validate in any way, shape, or form.

Click to expand...

There is no picture yet that show type 071 can carry 4 LCAC There is illustration that show it can carry 4 LCAC
But NO REAL PICTURE!
Calling name is typical of people who can't disprove a point All they have is name calling. It show your quality!
I am talking to a wall here

by78 said:

High-resolution photos of Yuyi at a recent amphibious assault exercise... To date, I have seen few photos of Yuyi carrying any meaningful payload. In most photos, they sail around empty (such as these). To be honest, I find this rather disappointing. One would think that by now the PLAN should be working them a bit harder.

Click to expand...

danielchin said:

not sure if a MBT is "meaningful"? but you're absolutely right, most pictures showed no payload at all...

Click to expand...

Iron Man said:

I find this entire class disappointing, TBH. A vessel the same size as the LCAC but can only carry 1/3 of the cargo (by volume).

Click to expand...

Those pics are just one part of the evidence NOT the whole evidence in regards to what is the Yuyi total payload. The PLA doesn't operate to satisfy naysayers, doubters or fanbois. They operate for a purpose.

Hendrik_2000 said:

There is no picture yet that show type 071 can carry 4 LCAC There is illustration that show it can carry 4 LCAC
But NO REAL PICTURE!
Calling name is typical of people who can't disprove a point All they have is name calling. It show your quality!
I am talking to a wall here

Click to expand...

You dare accuse me of "name calling" after you just called me a liar? How utterly hypocritical of you. What your eyes see your brain has rejected, just because you don't have the intellectual honesty to accept what is plain to see because you would rather be a massively and unrealistically biased fanboi.

Here is what the 726 looks like:



Here is what it SHOULD look like if it was in fact designed for two columns:


In the second photo (PSed), the air vents are gone/relocated and the ramp is wider. If the 726 were designed to load two columns, the PSed photo is what it should look like. Instead, it looks like the top photo. That, and the presence of the single set of tracks right down the middle of the deck makes it painfully obvious that this ACV was designed to load only a single column of vehicles. It could MAYBE load a couple rows of HMMWVs side by side in a pinch, but clearly it was not designed for this.

As for 4 726s in the 071's well deck, I will take an official PLAN model over your "opinions" any day of the week:


Yes, it's true we haven't photographically seen all 4 726s in the well deck yet, but then again we also haven't seen a fully-loaded 726 yet either. I guess according to your queer logic this must mean it is incapable of fully loading its deck with vehicles. ROFLMAO

Iron Man said:

You show me a fanboi CGI as some kind of proof that the Yuyi is bigger and longer? ROFLMAO

First of all, I'm not trying to say that they EXACTLY the same size, just approximately the same size. Second, that fakeass graphic is patently wrong to begin with since it shows a length of "33m", so how can 4 of them fit into a 071 well deck that measures 120m?

Click to expand...

Hendrik_2000 said:

I don't think that is true Yuyi is bigger and longer than their US counterpart We have been through this t before
It is optical illusion that they are the same dimension It is not!

Click to expand...

Google Maps measures it as ~30m, which would just allow it to squeeze in four at a time into the 071.

jobjed said:

Google images measures it as ~30m, which would just allow it to squeeze in four at a time into the 071.

Click to expand...

Exactly, the 726 must be 30m or less.

Again you are using a perspective view to judge the volume of Yuyi which is the wrong way of doing it . You will just get a distorted view . The single line in the middle cannot be use as proof of single file vehicle. Because they also have horizontal or lateral bar at both side of middle line, as mean to separate 2 vehicles. If it meant for single file than why the need for lateral bar on both side ? It clearly meant for 2 file of vehicles

I don't wont to go in the circle you can't convince me and vice versa wait until they show it with full load
I don't want to waste my breath it has been discussed before!

Iron Man said:

Exactly, the 726 must be 30m or less.

Click to expand...

It could be 30 m or more judging from the fuzzy picture because the skirt is blended with the water.And the small picture doesn't give a good resolution. Even at 30m which is 4 more meter than LCAC so I am right when I say Longer than their US counterpart!

Hendrik this is not the first time you post fake photos and make ridiculously claims

You have done this repeatedly

Some facts are established some are not

4 x LCAC fit into Type 071 well deck that is fact

Can fully loaded LCAC manoeuvre into a well deck ? Answer is we don't know

On basis of SDF standard no photo then it hasn't happened

Anything else is just heresay

asif iqbal said:

Hendrik this is not the first time you post fake photos and make ridiculously claims

You have done this repeatedly

Some facts are established some are not

4 x LCAC fit into Type 071 well deck that is fact

Can fully loaded LCAC manoeuvre into a well deck ? Answer is we don't know

On basis of SDF standard no photo then it hasn't happened

Anything else is just heresay

Click to expand...

Some see double it is certain some are not objective !