True. The "new" Russian Navy is a reflection of Putin, a calculated mix of charm and intimidation. Intimidation using Kalibr missiles that is. How many times they use the word "Kalibr" in all their press releases regarding any naval ship.
Nonetheless, there is a sudden interest and spurt in surface warfare ship construction after throwing all their money into submarines. That is why you suddenly got four frigates under construction or fitting (2nd Gorshkov class fitting, 3rd and 4th under construction, one more Grigorovich being constructed for Russia, two under construction sold to India) or more frigates depending on how you really view the Derzky, Stereguschy and Gremyaschy classes as being corvette or frigate. I think Russia, or in particular, Putin has rediscovered the usefulness of surface ships in the light of the Syrian campaign. Doesn't mean they may find funding for large destroyers in the next decade, but they may instead go for an improved or even a Super Gorshkov class instead.
Going back to the AGAT radar, even with a Super Gorshkov class, which might be a ship of around a Type 052C/D tonnage, 24 tons feel very steep even for that ship. Perhaps something much smaller and around the size of a SMART-L might be more palatable.
It was not a funding issue. It was because of the Ukrainian revolution and the embargo on Ukrainian marine gas turbines and diesel engines. It delayed the Russian frigate construction program. In particular the Grigorovich. The Gorshkov is more debatable since it also had delays with the electronics suite which were only solved recently. It is not easy to restart an industry after it has been stopped for over two decades. Most likely those people which had the know-how have retired already. Not to mention that a lot of the naval shipyard experience was in Ukraine, namely the carrier program and the large Slava-class cruisers, most of it stayed there after the USSR broke down.
The Grigorovich was more on schedule since the design was based on the Talwar. The Talwar was one of the few Russian naval designs that won exports after the USSR broke down.
I think the Lider class design is unbalanced and goes against current naval doctrine. It wastes a lot of deck space with those totem towers and it has a minuscule amount of VLS cells versus other ships with a similar or even lower weight class. I think they need to back to the drawing board on that one. Contrary to the frigate program the engines are not as much of an issue since Russia has developed next generation nuclear engines for their nuclear icebreaker program which can be used on the Lider.
I think the main issue here is that Russia has a large deficit in civilian merchant marine construction and their naval shipyard capacity is way too low. I think the Zvezda shipyard upgrades in Vladivostok are an example of things to come. Similar shipyards might be built in the West with large Russian conglomerates ordering ships to keep the shipyards busy.
They will modernize the existing shipyards in St. Petersburg, build newer dry docks, or both.
The fact is most of their surface navy is in the Western portion of the country so the most likely place to erect a large shipyard with the capacity to build those large civilian vessels and later large military ships must necessarily be there. If we look at it in terms of where the workforce is available then St. Petersburg is the natural choice to place the facilities.
Unlike in the previous decade where all these civilian ships were imported at a significant cost to the Russian economy since these typically have been paid in dollars to South Korea, Finland, or whatever, making more of the ships in Russia will both boost their shipyard know-how employment and provide them with the facilities to manufacture military ships in the future. Russia no longer has the oil revenues it had in the last decade due to the crashing oil price. So this means they must increase their amount of purchases from within as they have less foreign currency they can use.