Tajikistan decides China,Russia,Pakistan over NATO

FreeAsia2000

Junior Member
Tajik military weary of NATO

Military leaders in Tajikistan are attempting to forego NATO help and look to another direction for assistance.

By Roger McDermott for The Jamestown Foundation (4/4/06)

Tajikistan's military leadership has expressed public concern over the country's recent trend toward closer involvement with the NATO Alliance as a mechanism through which Dushanbe will gain enhanced military and security capabilities. The apparent turn in the direction of Tajikistan's stated aims in this sphere sends a worrying signal throughout the region at a difficult time for the evolving and dynamic relationship formed between the Alliance and the Central Asian militaries. However, the weak Tajik armed forces are desperately in need of multiple sources of foreign assistance and thus seek to diversify these sources beyond traditional security partners to include Pakistan.

Colonel-General Sherali Khayrulloyev, Tajikistan's defense minister, explained in Dushanbe on 29 March that he still considers Russia to be Tajikistan's most reliable military and security partner. "The Tajik armed forces have been set up thanks to Russia's assistance and contribution. Military-technical cooperation between our countries is at a very high level today." Khayrulloyev pointed to Tajikistan sending 300 to 400 servicemen annually to Russian military academies since 1994. These courses of study use a full training curriculum lasting three to five years. In contrast, programs sending servicemen to other countries, such as China, India, and the United States, provide only short-term courses lasting from one to six months, mainly because of the necessity to teach the servicemen a foreign language. Most surprisingly, Khayrulloyev weighed the opportunity of forming closer links with NATO against more typical arrangements with Moscow, concluding, "Soviet standards are no worse." Such attitudes are unsurprising in many ways, given the continued residue of Soviet-trained servicemen within these structures; as such thinking is endemic within the Ministry of Defense itself. Indeed, Tajikistan was slow to join the NATO Partnership for Peace (PfP) program, which it finally did in 2000, and a combination of factors has made difficult its relationship within the PfP process. (Interfax, Moscow, 29 March).

Of course, Russian and Tajik servicemen are regularly engaged in joint combat training. A joint exercise of the 92nd Motorized Rifle Regiment, part of the 201st Russian Motorized Rifle Division based in Dushanbe, and cadets from the Tajik Ministry of Defense military institute will commence exercises at the Lohur training ground on 4 April. The focus will be battalion-level defensive actions, and will be Russian led, funded, and instill Russian military-thinking practices on Tajik counterparts. Tajik brigades and Russian motorized rifle regiments have just concluded a joint exercise at the Mumirak and Sumbula training grounds in late March.

Joint training is cost effective and the preferred option for the weak Tajik military, especially when its high-profile exercises with Russia can project a positive image for its beleaguered armed forces. Nonetheless, Dushanbe does want to conduct its own training, though often to advertise its need for additional foreign assistance. A recent one-day drill was conducted at the Sumbula military range (Khuroson District of the southern Khatlon Region), codenamed Masnad-2006 (Position-2006). It involved divisions from the Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Emergency Situations, State Border Protection Committee, and the Interior Ministry's Directorate for the Khatlon Region. Carried out in three stages with more than 3,000 servicemen and officers from the relevant agencies participating, the exercise was intended to display competence in the face of a theoretical terrorist threat. The scenario rehearsed a response to an international terrorist group attacking two detachments' border troops and taking hostages. The Tajik Ministry of Defense said it expected to hold similar drills with the involvement of the Chinese armed forces in Mountainous Badakhshon Autonomous Region in the summer (Asia-Plus News, 28 March).

In addition to looking toward China for extra help with its armed forces, Dushanbe also envisages closer links with Pakistan. A Pakistani military delegation led by General Shahid Tirmizey, a committee chair from the Pakistani Armed Forces General Staff, made a two-day fact-finding visit to Tajikistan on 28-29 March. The delegation saw the Fakhrobod firing range, where a demonstration exercise was held. The delegation also held meetings with Salohiddin Nasriddinov, deputy Tajik minister of foreign affairs, as well as the leadership of the State Border Protection Committee and the Ministry of Defense (Avesta, 28 March; Itar-Tass, 29 March).

Khayrulloyev's overtly pro-Russian remarks must be seen in context. On 28 March President Emomali Rahmonov endorsed a single blueprint for combating terrorism and extremism, aimed at raising the effectiveness of the fight against modern threats in accordance with Tajikistan's international commitments. The blueprint itself therefore aims to ensure the closest possible collaboration among the power-wielding and law-enforcement agencies and Tajik state structures responsible for financial control with their counterparts from regional countries and other international anti-terrorist organizations in the fight against terrorism.

If this venture is to avoid being purely another paper effort to prove that the authorities are attempting to do something about the possible terrorist threat to the country, then Dushanbe will need help from a variety of sources. Khayrulloyev, in his efforts to deliver success in this area, fully understands the risks involved in closer integration with NATO and the upheaval to the weak Tajik armed forces that could ensue. He may, in this context alone, want to signal greater readiness to rely on Russian help, while looking to China and Pakistan for support that will not prove over-burdening, which some in the Tajik Ministry of Defense believe NATO's help would prove in the long term.

This article originally appeared in Eurasia Daily Monitor, published by The Jamestown Foundation in Washington, DC., at (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The Jamestown Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan organization supported by tax-deductible contributions from corporations, foundations, and individuals.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It appears that after Uzbekistan, Tajikistan has now decided to reduce it's links with NATO.

Presumably this has the backing of Russia ?
 

f2000

New Member
well if they join nato,they will get military asisstance more than russian could give them.nato will provide air protection with sending ac fighter like wat they provide to new nato members especially in east europe.
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
that would be extremely hard considering the location of uzbekistan and tajikistan. they are both land locked countries, so if NATO wants to help them, they got to fly over other nation's air space, and they might not get approval. eastern europeans countries on the other hand, even if land locked, are surrounded by NATO allies, so air space is not a problem.
 

f2000

New Member
they are not only received military assisstance but also in economy which will improving their country in many field especially in military since russian economy is not good enough to helping any countries.so they do right decision with joining nato since as u said tajik is landlocked country.
 

FreeAsia2000

Junior Member
f2000 said:
they are not only received military assisstance but also in economy which will improving their country in many field especially in military since russian economy is not good enough to helping any countries.so they do right decision with joining nato since as u said tajik is landlocked country.

f2000 did you read what Pisigma wrote ?...the country is landlocked.

How are you going to get around that ?
 

Finn McCool

Captain
Registered Member
Well, they could fly accross Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea to get to Tajikistan. I don't think those countries would have problem with it, especially Georgia. Or from say, Deigo Garcia across the Indian Ocean, over the rump of Pakistan and across Afghanistan. Those would both work.

I think these countries are getting away from NATO because they want to have military aid without annoying, bothersome comments about massacring protesters, Stalinist purges and such. Good old Hu and Putin are willing to give aid with no Human rights strings attached.:china:
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
in a crisis, you don't know who will give you rights to their air space. for example if china got into a showdown with US (just an example, don't start a flamewar people), and all the nato nations get involved. if tajistan is a nato nation, do you think other nato nations will be able to help them?? i highly doubt it. china will have pakistan's support, so china will make sure no supplies from other nato nations reach tajikistan from pakistani air space. azerbajianis still currently under heavy russian influence, and khazakstan controls huge areas of the caspian sea, they are part of the SCO.
 

FreeAsia2000

Junior Member
Please examine a map.

Tajikistan is nowhere near the Caucasus states and it is surrounded
by non too friendly countries like Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.

Who are pretty hostile to Tajik proposals to damn the rivers which
are their lifeblood
 

f2000

New Member
well tajikistan has border with china,afghanistan,kyrgystan n uzbekistan.
if conflict happen,the only airspace that can nato can use freely is trough afghanistan since us troops are there.if from diedo garcia they need to fly over pakistan.that is why if they join nato the will needed airspace protection by nato in any conflict
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
f2000, i still don't know how you think nato can protect tajik.. the question we are all asking you is how does the nato nations such as USA, Canada, britian or france get thie Tajik airspace to protect them???? there's no way to fly in. don't assume that pakistan will just let nato forces fly over them.
 
Top