Taiwan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Pointblank

Senior Member
Probably.



No - Taiwan hasnt even formally requested them yet.



Not much wrong with the economy - theyre affordable.



Supposedly theyre being examined for replacing the older tanks.



See above - theyre not going to replace all tanks like the M-60s.
Don't forget that the US Army has thousands of M1 Abrams sitting on lots, in storage. They are willing to unload some of them if needed, as was demonstrated by the Australians.
 

kliu0

Junior Member
Not sure when or if Taiwan is going to get the AH-64D, but considering the state of the economy isn't it a little expensive, not to mention no commonality with the Cobras Taiwan already has. And is Taiwan really trying to get M1A2's? Why not get something like the Sabra upgrade from Israel for the M-60, cheaper and more then enough power to handle to handle Chinese amphibious forces?

1. Taiwan has already allocated money to purchase the AH-64Ds and UH-60s. Just don't know if US going to sell them or not.

2. Several large Taiwanese newspapers have reported that the Army was considering procuring new M1A2 tanks to replace the older M-48s and some of the M-60s.

3. Taiwan can't really buy stuff from Israel these days, Israel sells the majority of their stuff to China already.

4. Taiwan has the current strategy to take on the Amphibious force before it actually lands. Using IDFs, F-16s, Mirage 2000Es, AH-1Ws, The ROC Navy and artillery. Once they land the M-60s aren't really good against the new Anti-tank weaponary.

Post Note* If they havn't sent a formal letter of intent, are they ever likely to send the letter to procure the M1A2s?
 

Mr T

Senior Member
If they havn't sent a formal letter of intent, are they ever likely to send the letter to procure the M1A2s?

The budget for next year hasnt even been put together yet - no point in sending off letters of intent before the gov knows it can put money aside next year.
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Taiwan's newly elected government plans to cut armed forces strength 25 percent (from 270,000 troops to 200,000). The new

It just occurred to me that part of this "reduction" in numbers, may be from a reduction in service length. Weren't they looking to reduce conscript service length from 18 months to 12 months?
 

kliu0

Junior Member
Maybe, but there are still a large amount of males who havn't completed military service and are on the waiting list.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
U.S. Freezes $12B in Arms Sales to Taiwan
BY wendell minnick
Published: 9 Jun 16:02 EDT (12:02 GMT) Print | Email

TAIPEI - As China and Taiwan prepare for their first official talks in more than a decade, sources in both Taipei and Washington say the U.S. State Department has decided to freeze all congressional notifications for $12 billion worth of arms sales to Taiwan.

Sources are mixed on whether the freeze will extend through the remainder of the Bush administration or only until after the August Beijing Olympics. Fears in Taipei are the freeze could become permanent with a new U.S. president in January.

Related TopicsAmericas
Asia & Pacific Rim
The freeze is part of an effort not to derail Beijing-Taipei negotiations, scheduled to begin June 11, or disturb plans by U.S. President George W. Bush to attend the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics.

The freeze covers about $12 billion worth of weapon sales now being processed under the Pentagon's Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program and items still awaiting approval, including 30 Boeing AH-64D Apache Longbow attack helicopters, 60 Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters, eight diesel electric submarines, four Raytheon Patriot PAC-3 air defense missile batteries and 66 Lockheed Martin F-16C/D Block 50/52 fighters. The freeze does not include 12 Lockheed Martin P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft, which have already been approved.

Sources are saying the State Department, along with heavy lobbying by officials assigned to the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, has been pushing hard to freeze arms sales to Taiwan to placate China. The freeze comes at a bad time for the U.S. defense industry, with expected cuts in defense spending and recent problems in the U.S. economy.

Beijing also has been successful at curtailing U.S. defense company activities in Taiwan. Boeing closed its Taipei office two years ago after threats that Beijing would curtail future sales of commercial aircraft.

In the first quarter of this year, the Taiwan electorate gave the Kuomintang (KMT) a sweeping majority in the legislature and elected its first KMT president, Ma Ying-jeou, in eight years. The election demonstrated public dissatisfaction with the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The return of the KMT gave Beijing the green light to go forward with formal talks on establishing direct flights, economic accords and a potential peace accord.

The discussions between the once stalwart enemies are being compared with the Egyptian-Israeli peace talks of the 1970s. However, the rapid negotiations have given pause in the U.S. government with calls for a wait-and-see approach.

"Supposedly, according to scuttlebutt here, [a U.S. State Department official] asked Ma at the inauguration if he was still interested in F-16s, subs, etc., and Ma insisted that he was, but it was not the right time to ask for them with all the cross-Strait talks going on," said John Tkacik, senior fellow, Heritage Foundation, and a former U.S. State Department official with service in China.

A source close to Ma stated his administration will continue to push for the release of F-16s, arguing Taiwan must be able to negotiate with China from a position of strength.

"Otherwise, the Chinese will only dictate terms to Taiwan," he said.

"Here, the word is the White House won't move forward unless Ma asks, and Ma isn't asking," Tkacik said. "KMT people blame the delay on the U.S., and the U.S. smiles its Cheshire-Cat smile and says, 'Taiwan hasn't asked.' It seems there's a decision in Washington to shove Taipei into Beijing's warm embrace, and Taipei's leadership is too divided on the issue to make a decision."

The U.S. de facto embassy in Taipei, the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), has consistently turned down a letter of request [LOR] for price and availability data for 66 F-16s for almost two years.

The argument given at AIT is the U.S. government would be forced to make a policy decision on rejecting the F-16s, and therefore the LOR is quietly discouraged.

Sources in Taipei have indicated a formal rejection of F-16s would result in a permanent decision, and the best timing for accepting an F-16 LOR would be after the Olympics and before the next U.S. administration is sworn into office in 2009.

However, the blanket freeze, which includes submarines and PAC-3s already promised by the Bush administration in 2001, is unprecedented in Taiwan-U.S. relations. Indications are the Bush administration has decided to pass the decision on to the next president.

Mark Stokes, former country director for China and Taiwan in the Office of the Secretary of Defense from 1997-2004, and described by many in the defense community as the "staff coordinator" of the 2001 decision to offer Taiwan submarines, PAC-3s and P-3 Orions by the Bush administration, said the freeze violates the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).

"I would argue that the holding of these notifications, and refusal to accept and act upon the LOR for price and availability constitutes a freeze on arms sales to Taiwan. Nothing more and nothing less," he said. "This assertion is based upon more than a decade of direct and intimate involvement in the process. It also violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the Taiwan Relations Act, a legal document that seems to be getting less and less attention these days."

Stokes, who is now the executive director of the Project 2049 Institute, said the "alleged rationale" in Washington is "ostensibly to provide the new democratically elected administration under President Ma Ying-jeou an opportunity to review its own requirements and priorities."

Stokes argues a policy review, including defense security policy in general, is expected. However, he said the decision to move forward on arms sales should be left to the Taiwanese, and not determined by coercion from Beijing and efforts by Beijing-friendly elements in the U.S. State Department.

Ma has been going forward quickly in negotiations with Beijing on direct flights, and many believe Beijing-Taipei relations will grow quickly with economic and peace accords slated within the next five-to-10 years, respectively.

These efforts, argue some Taiwan watchers, increase the chances Taiwan will become part of China's overall security bubble, allowing the Chinese and Taiwanese militaries to work together on regional security goals within the next 10 to 20 years.

Worst-case scenarios include basing Chinese forces in Taiwan, including air and naval facilities that would extend China's reach into the Pacific, and turn the Taiwan Strait into a potential choke point for oil shipments from the Middle East to Japan and South Korea.

There are also fears that new F-16s, equipped with the sophisticated new APG-80 advanced electronically scanned radar system, could end up in the hands of China via an orchestrated defection or simply given access to the platform in Taiwan.

The real question for many cross-Strait watchers is: How far will the relationship go in the next few years? Will China successfully integrate Taiwan economically, diplomatically and militarily? Or will Taiwan manage to maintain a semblance of autonomy?
 

kliu0

Junior Member
Shocking how this event is unfolding. Does the US government actually care about how Beijing thinks or how unemployment is going to rise dramatically in the States. Whats with the deal to please China anyway, I mean if US sells weapons to Taiwan the Chinese aren't going to boycott I mean its their games. Best they can do is defeat the US in the olympics. But thats sporting nothing to do with politics. The US shouldn't meddle sports and politics together. Whats even worse is where's the strong hardliners in the senate and government that for the sales of weapons to Taiwan? Clearly this approach toward the sales is not in line with the Taiwan Relations Act.

I partially understand the blocking of Apaches, F-16s. But the blocking of UH-60 Blackhawks...thats just ridiculous. I mean does the US want more Taiwanese military personnel to die because of the ageing Hueys'? Why not sell them C4 planted weapons and when Taiwan gets em America can press the big button to blow the country of Taiwan up. So much for self-defence on the Taiwan Relations Act, when the military can't even move around.

On a lighter note, does the freeze include the upgrades of the Patriot missile systems already in place to PAC 3 standard? and what about the missiles that come with it too?

Mods note...Watch your language.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mr T

Senior Member
On a lighter note, does the freeze include the upgrades of the Patriot missile systems already in place to PAC 3 standard? and what about the missiles that come with it too?

Shouldn't do as that's already had notification through Congress. But I don't think there are any new missiles with that deal - it's just a technical upgrade.
 

Roger604

Senior Member
Re: Rafale Hampered by Cost

The thing is that Taiwan is in a unique situation. Although it can use the prospect of the US sale to its advantage in pushing the French to offer a better deal, the Rafale is something it can't get from the Americans at the moment.

Morocco went for the F-16 because it doesn't actually need something like the Rafale right now - so it could go for price. As for South Korea it had the option of the Strike Eagle, as well as other planes. If the Rafale had to face off against the Strike Eagle maybe it would lose, but it has a better chance against the F-16 as Taiwan won't have the opportunity to get another 4.5 generation plane for the foreseeable future.

So it comes down to price. If the French offer the Rafale as part of a reasonable deal, maybe with other sales attached to it, I think the Taiwanese would go for it. If they try to push Taiwan too far they would go with the F-16.

Hey what happened to Fu Manchu?? He hasn't appeared on the board since around March 28.

It would be good to hear his opinion about the freezing of arms sales.
 

kliu0

Junior Member
I'm pretty sure that I heard somewhere that the Taiwanese government was ordering new missiles. Maybe they havn't sent a letter of intent for new missiles then.

Any news on the UAV program for Taiwan? All I've heard is that they're planning to put Hellfire missiles on them and mass produce the UAVs?
 
Last edited:
Top