Reminds me of that other incident last year:Taiwan F-16 flying to the US for training force landing in Hawaii. I've been seeing many F-16 landing nose down. Does F-16's nose landing gear especially weak?
Screen shot from Youtube
Reminds me of that other incident last year:Taiwan F-16 flying to the US for training force landing in Hawaii. I've been seeing many F-16 landing nose down. Does F-16's nose landing gear especially weak?
Screen shot from Youtube
No one should be driving a tank while drunk.
@ZeEa5KPul bro a peacock poseI call this particular F-16 pose "bowing to the king":
View attachment 90283
What a stupid waste of money.
There's a reason why nobody else uses supersonic LACMs. They combine the drawbacks of both ballistic missiles (everyone can see you) and subsonic LACMs (all sorts of air defense assets, both SAMs and fighters, can take potshots at you. A long range supersonic LACM is essentially just a giant supersonic target drone). Something with a 2000km range and a Mach 3-3.5 speed will get shot down by SAMs, the PLAAF/PLANAF and DDGs long before it gets to Beijing.
It would be less effective than Iraqi SCUDs. At least the SCUDs were difficult to intercept.What a stupid waste of money.
There's a reason why nobody else uses supersonic LACMs. They combine the drawbacks of both ballistic missiles (everyone can see you) and subsonic LACMs (all sorts of air defense assets, both SAMs and fighters, can take potshots at you. A long range supersonic LACM is essentially just a giant supersonic target drone). Something with a 2000km range and a Mach 3-3.5 speed will get shot down by SAMs, the PLAAF/PLANAF and DDGs long before it gets to Beijing.
Haha I understood that reference.There is no way that this missile could hit Beijing because Earth is round.