Imo it's a bit of both, Taiwan is indefensible to an extent, but the US should still focus on it. I like the current US policy and pushing boundaries because it's clear China is in the less favorable position.
They can have. But who cares about the few missiles? Mainland has thousands.Is the Taiwanese regime threatening a first strike?
They claim 1500 km range for a supersonic cruise missile. I do not think that is credible.
I believe the way to deal with Taiwan is attritional total war that prevents them from fighting back by any means. Any mainland casualties can give them hope unless they're as ineffective as Saddam Hussein.They can have. But who cares about the few missiles? Mainland has thousands.
I believe the way to deal with Taiwan is attritional total war that prevents them from fighting back by any means. Any mainland casualties can give them hope unless they're as ineffective as Saddam Hussein.
I believe a 052D boost phase interception test should be conducted to demonstrate resolve in the face of this new threat.
Part of attritional war would be not getting hit though, to maximize own morale and minimize theirs. Getting hit at all, especially civilians, means that they have some way of fighting back and thus morale. A 052D demonstration of missile interception removes their hope.I think if determined China can build a bomber similar to the B-52, or China can build a special version of the Y-20, turning it into a giant bomb truck. After destroying Taiwan's air defense and radar systems, the rest is to hand over to the bombers. Hundreds of Y-20s could drop countless MOABs, or use a carpet-bombing strategy.
Is the Taiwanese regime threatening a first strike?
They claim 1500 km range for a supersonic cruise missile. I do not think that is credible.
They would honestly be better off copying the mainland and developing very long range MLRS instead.