Speculation and facts on future Chinese vessels

delft

Brigadier
Cavitation is the water boiling at the reduced pressure on the suction side of the prop. It can be eliminated by turning the prop slower but also by diving deeper. So you can, as far as cavitation is concerned, travel at a good speed if you are deep enough.
 
Last edited:

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
LOL this kind of reasoning is enough to elevate PLAN subs to the levels of USN subs? Sounds like you know all that is needed to be known about submarine quieting technology.
otu
Well at least I work in similar technology instead of fanboys mouthing nonsense. Care to poke a hole in my argument?
 

nemo

Junior Member
the inability to reduce the noise to Western level may be due to something simple -- bearings. China simply lack the technology to manufacture bearing to the same tolerance as the best Western and Japanese ones. Since there is lots of place where bearing is used, noise and vibration builds up.
 

Mysterre

Banned Idiot
Sorry, but this sounds like bait. @Mysterre, maybe you can expound on where you work, rather than demanding Hendrik spill the beans...

This is a ludicrous response, as I am NOT the one claiming to have greater knowledge than the others here due to my line of work, but Hendrik IS, so why in the hell are you asking ME to spill the beans? Can your bias be any more obvious?
 

paintgun

Senior Member
people, we need to stop antagonizing each other

there is much hate floating around lately, lack of respect and general willingness toward a healthy discussion
 

kroko

Senior Member
the inability to reduce the noise to Western level may be due to something simple -- bearings. China simply lack the technology to manufacture bearing to the same tolerance as the best Western and Japanese ones. Since there is lots of place where bearing is used, noise and vibration builds up.

Then china´s precision machines need more precision.
 

Quickie

Colonel
This is a ludicrous response, as I am NOT the one claiming to have greater knowledge than the others here due to my line of work, but Hendrik IS, so why in the hell are you asking ME to spill the beans? Can your bias be any more obvious?

I think Red Moon was referring to your very first taunting reply to Hendrik's post.
 

kroko

Senior Member
Really? Exactly what "similar" technology do you work with?

I have to agree with mystere here. Hendrik was the one who claimed to work on a "similar tech", not mystere. I also want to know what "similar technology" hendrik works for.
 
Last edited:
Top