South Korean Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

shen

Senior Member
Sounds like the old THAAD System (which I worked on in its initial stages in the 1990s before Clinton canceled it) has developed into a very good system.

If Russia and China are both this concerned about it, particularly when S. Korea sits a short distance from a N. Korean leader who repeatedly threatens to attack the South with missiles, then they must respect its capabilities greatly.

In fact, I know that it has become a premier anti-missile defense system.

It is more complicated than that. THAAD missiles of course don't have the range to intercept either Chinese or Russian ICBM thus doesn't pose a strategic threat. The AN/TPY-2 radar that's part of the THAAD system is potentially more worrisome because it can monitor high altitude targets out to 1000km range, inside China and Russian border. But since it is still a relatively small mobile X-band radar, can't compare with the big sea based X-band BMD radar, its volume search capability is limited.

Other concerns are.
Russian companies are working with South Korea to develop L-SAM anti-missile system, which SK has picked over THAAD because it want to develop its domestic industry and because it want a 360 degree system that covers threat from Japan as well as North Korea rather than a 180 degree system that only cover threat from the north. So obvious Russia don't like US trying to influence South Korea to buy THAAD instead.
China don't like the idea of another advanced weapons system introduced to the Korean peninsula which will make the North Korean regime more paranoid and less likely to negotiate to get rid of its nuclear weapons.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Future South Korean fighter plane will be built by KAI and Lockheed Martin

kf-x.jpg

(Defensa.com) Management of Defense Acquisition Programs (DAPA) South Korea yesterday announced the selection of the team of Korean Aerospace Industries (KAI) and Lockheed Martin for the design and construction of new fighter aircraft KF-X. The other option presented was the team that make up Airbus and Korean Air (KAL) which was formalized in January this year. According to statements by the DAPA, choosing KAI and Lockheed Martin was based taking into account the costs, the project presented and production capacity. The sources said the contract could be signed during the first half of this year, pending still close all details of the agreement.

The program involves the construction of 120 fighter jets worth 7,800 million to replace US-made aircraft F-4 and F-5 South Korean Air Force. Recall that Indonesia also participates in the program, hence to provide 20% financing, with 60% of the money contributed by South Korea and another 20% by the chosen industrial group, as announced in April last year.

The KF-X program was approved in 2010 and includes the manufacture of 120 units of this fighter fourth generation between 2023 and 2030. Until not too long ago the feasibility of this program was uncertain because it has been delayed numerous times with the corresponding rumors that a project cost overruns.

Thus Lockheed Martin would be imposed on Airbus in the South Korean market in 2013 after the F-35 is imposed on the Eurofighter Typhoon in a contract for the supply of 40 aircraft last generation. To some extent Predictably an outcome like this if we consider the special strategic relationship uniting South Korea and the United States and which is embodied in the presence of US forces in the country as against the threat northern neighbor . In this context it is not surprising that programs for military procurement in this country are in the United States one of the main suppliers. There previous collaboration between KAI and Lockheed Martin in the area of combat aircraft since developed the advanced trainer and light attack T-50.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Back to bottling my Grenache
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Future South Korean fighter plane will be built by KAI and Lockheed Martin

kf-x.jpg

(Defensa.com) Management of Defense Acquisition Programs (DAPA) South Korea yesterday announced the selection of the team of Korean Aerospace Industries (KAI) and Lockheed Martin for the design and construction of new fighter aircraft KF-X. The other option presented was the team that make up Airbus and Korean Air (KAL) which was formalized in January this year. According to statements by the DAPA, choosing KAI and Lockheed Martin was based taking into account the costs, the project presented and production capacity. The sources said the contract could be signed during the first half of this year, pending still close all details of the agreement.

The program involves the construction of 120 fighter jets worth 7,800 million to replace US-made aircraft F-4 and F-5 South Korean Air Force. Recall that Indonesia also participates in the program, hence to provide 20% financing, with 60% of the money contributed by South Korea and another 20% by the chosen industrial group, as announced in April last year.

The KF-X program was approved in 2010 and includes the manufacture of 120 units of this fighter fourth generation between 2023 and 2030. Until not too long ago the feasibility of this program was uncertain because it has been delayed numerous times with the corresponding rumors that a project cost overruns.

Thus Lockheed Martin would be imposed on Airbus in the South Korean market in 2013 after the F-35 is imposed on the Eurofighter Typhoon in a contract for the supply of 40 aircraft last generation. To some extent Predictably an outcome like this if we consider the special strategic relationship uniting South Korea and the United States and which is embodied in the presence of US forces in the country as against the threat northern neighbor . In this context it is not surprising that programs for military procurement in this country are in the United States one of the main suppliers. There previous collaboration between KAI and Lockheed Martin in the area of combat aircraft since developed the advanced trainer and light attack T-50.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Back to bottling my Grenache

Looks like a smaller J-20.o_O
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
It is more complicated than that.
Actually...it is not.

THAAD missiles of course don't have the range to intercept either Chinese or Russian ICBM thus doesn't pose a strategic threat. The AN/TPY-2 radar that's part of the THAAD system is potentially more worrisome because it can monitor high altitude targets out to 1000km range, inside China and Russian border.
It is not meant to be a national defense system, ony a Theater defense..

Russian companies are working with South Korea to develop L-SAM anti-missile system, which SK has picked over THAAD because it want to develop its domestic industry and because it want a 360 degree system that covers threat from Japan as well as North Korea rather than a 180 degree system that only cover threat from the north. So obvious Russia don't like US trying to influence South Korea to buy THAAD instead.
Too bad. That's how this works. Both sides will try and influence the buyer to go their way.

And as to 360 vs 180 coverage...well, the solution to that is fairly obvious.

The THAAD system can cover 360 degrees.

China don't like the idea of another advanced weapons system introduced to the Korean peninsula which will make the North Korean regime more paranoid and less likely to negotiate to get rid of its nuclear weapons.
Well, those negotiations did not produce results. Why? Because the North took economic help and promised to abide by non-development agreements...and then they went ahead and did it anyway.

N. Korea is also constantly threatening the South with ballistic missile attack and test fires missiles fairly regularly.

South Korea is simply wanting to defend themselves against a blustering offensive capability of the North. Having a defensive weapon for the South that is not strategic is not a threat to anyone. In fact, for the people of South Korea, is will be very good thing in that environment.
 
Last edited:
I believe this is important:
US, ROK Navies Conduct Mine Countermeasures Drill
The U.S. and Republic of Korea (ROK) navies conducted a successful mine countermeasures exercise March 30 – April 11 as part of Foal Eagle 2015.

The bilateral training is designed to increase readiness and interoperability in mine countermeasures operations and enhance theater security cooperation between the two navies.

Approximately 300 U.S. Navy personnel assigned to MCMRON 7, mine countermeasures ships USS Warrior (MCM 10) and USS Chief (MCM 14); along with teams from Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit (EODMU) 5, Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit (EODMU) 1, Naval Oceanography Mine Warfare Center, Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron 14, and Mobile Mine Assembly Group participated in the training alongside their ROK Navy partners.

During the exercise, U.S. and ROK Navy ships and explosive ordnance disposal divers practiced clearing routes for shipping and conducted training surveys for clearing operational areas. In addition to ships, remotely operated vehicles were also used to rehearse mine countermeasures operations from under the sea.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


P.S. I've recently read
Navy brass don't like mines because they can't make them salute and take orders.
LOL!
 
a moment ago I found THAAD news:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
can’t nuke the US, not yet. But boy dictator Kim Jong-un already has about a thousand ballistic missiles capable of hitting
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and, in some cases,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— potentially with a nuclear warhead. Against a large-scale launch, former Pentagon strategist
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
said this morning, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the peninsula are “woefully outgunned.” In that scenario, the current combination of Army
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and Navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
couldn’t defend our own bases, let alone our allies’ cities.

As North Korea’s arsenal grows, said Jackson, “we’re kind of inching our way towards crisis and nobody’s doing anything to stop it.”

That’s why we must build up missile defenses in South Korea, said Jackson, Amb.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
scientist John Schilling at a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
press breakfast this morning and in follow-ups with Breaking Defense. Step one, Jackson said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which brings
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and interceptors than the Patriots. In longer run, the three experts added, l
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
might fill a valuable niche role — but only a niche. (More on that tomorrow).

Just the idea of deploying THAAD is already controversial in South Korea and outright condemned by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, admitted Jackson, now a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security. But having just come from the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Seoul — a gathering considered “the Davos of Korea” — Jackson said the politics of THAAD are shifting.

“The Koreans are much more favorable about THAAD,” he said, “than they were six months ago.” That’s not because of any brilliant strategy on America’s part — the US hasn’t even made an official proposal to deploy new missile defense, he said — but because of “heavy-handedness” on the part of the Chinese. In a twist that must
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, China has lobbied South Korea so hard against the THAAD deployment that Koreans, as a backlash, are now more in favor of it.

Even so, said Jackson, “I wouldn’t anticipate South Korea asking for a deployment of THAAD without some kind of precipitating event, [such as] maybe a fourth nuclear test” by the North. Of course, if there’s one thing we can count on in the unpredictable peninsula, it’s that Pyongyang will do something provocative, given time.

But might Pyongyang and Beijing seen a THAAD deployment as provocative itself? Might it raise the risk of a regional arms race, asked an Arms Control Association staffer in the audience, by causing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to invest in new ways to overcome US-made missile defenses?

“This stuff is already happening,” said Jackson, pointing to Chinese and Russian research into such things as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Both countries are already basing their military investments on the possibility of conflict with the West: Strengthening missile defenses in Korea will do little to change that calculus.

As a practical matter, Schilling warned me in an email, if we do get into an arms race with China on the peninsula, we and South Korea will lose: “The Chinese can win that fight by proxy, shipping cheap missile parts to North Korea faster and in greater quantity than we can deploy THAAD or Patriot” — Pyongyang relies currently on black market imports of aging Russian tech — “or they could massively expand their own
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, or both.”

Beijing does depict US missile defenses as destablizing. At the Asan Plenum, said Jackson, the Chinese participants argued that THAAD posed an offensive threat, with radar and missiles that could reach right across North Korea into Chinese territory. That’s technically true, he said, but irrelevant: Both THAAD’s radar and its interceptors are designed to deal with incoming missiles, not to attack ground targets or spy on Chinese activities.

“It can’t see inside a Chinese bedroom,” said Jackson “[The Chinese argument] makes it sound like we’re able to use the x-band radar to spy on China in a way we’re not capable of doing already.”

The THAAD interceptors could theoretically target Chinese aircraft — missile defense systems can usually do air defense as well — but even if they were launched from right below the DMZ, they lack the range to penetrate significantly into Chinese airspace.

“The impression I have, the impression that many of the South Koreans shared, the impression that the Chinese gave, was that pressuring South Korea to not allow the deployment of THAAD had nothing to do with military operations,” Jackson said. Instead, he said, the Chinese were worried about the political significance of THAAD as barometer of US-South Korean relations: “The deployment of THAAD is an indicator that the alliance is still functioning.”

“It’s a bigger political issue,” agreed Wit. “Anything that creates a tighter and closer US-South Korean alliance is probably something the Chinese are not going to support.”

That said,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that Pyongyang’s growing arsenal is a problem. In his conversations with Chinese participants at Anan, Jackson said, “they see North Korea’s nuclear missile developments as very alarming.” They just think the US should rely on diplomacy rather than military deterrence, let alone preemption.

Diplomacy with North Korea, however, has provided decades of frustration for little gain. The Foreign Ministry has little power to make deals, while the military has no experience or aptitude at dealing with outsiders, said Witt, a veteran of such negotiations himself.

Meanwhile the danger continues to grow, albeit slowly and painfully for the cash-strapped Hermit Kingdom. “The lack of progress over the last few decades is striking,” writes Schilling and co-author Henry Kan in their recent report, “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.” North Korea’s missile-makers have long since been outstripped by their former protégés in Iran and Pakistan.

Pyongyang’s arsenal still relies on old Soviet technology. Most of its missiles are derived from the 1960s-vintage Scud. But that’s still dangerous stuff. The Nodong “Super Scud” variant has enough range — 7,500 to 10,000 miles — to hit all of South Korea and much of Japan. It is small enough to hide in caves to avoid airstrikes, then pop out to launch. And it may already be capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

...
etc. (10000 words limit reached), the rest is in the source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


ROKN MLS-570 Nampo.jpg
MLS-II-570 Nampo
Marine Link said:
Shipbuilder Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) launched the second minelayer, MLS-II Nampo, for the Korean Navy.

In attendance at the MLS-II launching ceremony were Baek Seung-joo, Vice Minister of National Defense of Republic of Korea; Kwon Oh-gap, President & CEO of HHI; and 100 other guests.

The MLS-II Nampo is both HHI and Korea’s second minelayer following MLS-560 Wonsan that was delivered in 1997 and are currently in operation. The MLS-II Nampo which can carry 120 crew measures 114 meters in length, 17 meters in width and 28 meters in depth with a displacement of 3,000 tons.

The next-generation stealth minelayer is specially built to lay a large number of mines precisely at the designated spots in a short period of time. The MLS-II Nampo is scheduled to be delivered to the Korean Navy by October 2016 after outfitting work, sea trials and final inspections.

HHI said it has been playing a key role in strengthening the defense capabilities of the Korean Navy by delivering a total of 71 naval ships including 12 frigates/patrol ships, three destroyers, three submarines and two Aegis destroyers.

Here's the first one:

ROKN MLS-560 Wonsan.jpg
MLS-560 Wonsan
And another pic of the launch of the new MLS-II-570 Nampo

ROKN MLS-570 Nampo-02.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top