Significance of the Al Khalid

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was talking about how PA could have cut off IA from Kashmir and perhaps reach Dehli in 1965. After these incidents Pak realized that the India had too much depth. They had quantity and the will to use it once it was moblized. Today the Pak doesn't even have the same reaction as India. The recent earth quake tragedy is a example.

Click to expand...

Yeah, and India's reaction to the 12/12/04 tsunami was lightening fast, right?:roll:

Dont compare a militaries readyness by it's ability to react to natural disasters. Does the U.S military have poor reaction because it could not save the people of New orleans from katrina? Of course not.

Yes it was Miggy ol'chum.:rofl:
Maybe you need to look at how InAF reacted more closely. The relief effort was much better on the Indian part. Even during the earth quate disaster. India had a much larger helecopter fleet and transport aircrafts.

OK guys. Let's get off the subject of the earthquake. To jatt, the earthquake killed nearly 10,000 Pakistani soldiers in Kashmir. The entire nation was in disarray because of the disaster. A disaster does not show prove how effective a military is. A military is good at fighting, not at helping with disasters.

Now the topic was the Al Khalid. Let's get back on track shall we?:nono:

Red not dead

You should not think about Muhammad(PBUH) this way. Nither of GOD's prophets did this nor any of them was sent for making wars and to kill people as we think of them now. They all promoted peace, freedom and respect for others. Specially if you study Islam, you will find that Muhammad(PBUH) demonstrated a civilization based on humanity that was examplary in that time. So dont blame on Muhammad(PBUH) for what others do.
Hope you got the point.