ROFL... So if Iran doesn't do what you want, you're advocating a military attack? Let me guess, you were a fan of Bush? Maybe you want to go search for WMDs in Iran now?
i swear to god, bladerunner, for all the respect of him being an old-timer, he's so "neo-con/republican" about these things
bladerunner's solution of bombing anyone who defies the west is quite like suggesting turning iran to the new pre-'03 iraq
-----------------------
bladerunner:
Quote:
So if Iran doesn't do what you want, you're advocating a military attack?
Its not only me , most people in the West would not be adverse to a military strike on the nuclear installations. As I said earlier, Chinas the fly in the ointment, when it comes to non military means.
I actually wonder if China would be that upset if Iraq's nuclear installations were taken out.
Neither would Russia at a guess. Note how shes holding back on delivering the Sam300's, to make it easier for the West?
------------------------------------
this is why the rest of the world hates the west. defy and we suppress u militarily. such actions are so irrational, barbaric, suppressive, and ignorant. do u think the anti-west idealists woke up one day and decided to go after the west? where do u think the anti-western sentiments in china comes from?
no offense, it's people who thinks "defy and we'll pop yo arse" that gives the west a bad name (to give a hint, it starts with "i" and ends with "-ist/-ism", and also creates a lot of the world's major conflicts today
---------------------------------
I'm a neo con to the last. Bush had the right idea, but wasnt very good in carrying them out.
--------------------------------
so u're saying it's right to go bomb iraq?