Does anybody have further information about this particular FC-31 model? It's either a poorly-made one (which won't be surprising to say the least) or maybe the FC-31 did undergo design modifications for future tranches.
I agree with your point. At the same time, no one has ever used a CBG against a peer rival in Modern warfare. A so-called peer rival will have significant offensive weapons to thwart a CBG from gaining any meaningful occupation near its shores. When we talk about peer rivals, I can only think of the US., Russia and China. These nations have Militaries of scale with highly developed MIC.Any news if FC-31 will be navalized? Liaoning and Shandong are nifty, but without navalized stealth variants, they are only useful at projecting power against weaker small states, not peer rivals.
US Navy is the same?but without navalized stealth variants, they are only useful at projecting power against weaker small states, not peer rivals.
While changes are many, fundamental rule changed little: attacking carrier force chooses time and conditions of engagement. It's able to concentrate in the fog of war, while enemy only reacts.At the same time, no one has ever used a CBG against a peer rival in Modern warfare.
I agree with your point. At the same time, no one has ever used a CBG against a peer rival in Modern warfare. MIC.
US Navy is the same?
EW, Stand off munitions, AA suppression, tactics - all of them are not relevant anymore?
While changes are many, fundamental rule changed little: attacking carrier force chooses time and conditions of engagement. It's able to concentrate in the fog of war, while enemy only reacts.
It's crucial.
pb19980515 on a number of things, including drones used to simulate stealth aircraft and FC-31's RCS. Someone else can translate.
Q: Big God means FC31 radar reflection area is 0.002
pb: Poor design index of Uighur Eagle
Not much is this magnitude. That is the lowest value for some specific test environments. . . . . The lowest practical value is generally 0.01-0.05.