Shenyang FC-31 / J-31 Fighter Demonstrator

Status
Not open for further replies.

latenlazy

Brigadier
The best way to think about it is thinking about a stick/baseball bat. When someone points a stick directly at you at eye-level, you won't even be able to determine the length of it, because you can only see the tip. When it's pointing towards the sky, then you can see the whole stick.

The same idea applies to airplanes. Sure, stealth jets can reduce RCS even when being scanned from underneath, but the fundamental problem is that they start from a large flat surface. The canard makes it worse. Comparing F22 to J20, from a purely technical point of view, not saying which is better. Hypothetically speaking, say the radar scans the jets directly from underneath, say there's only x,y plane, no third dimension. The canards on the J-20 adds to the total surface area to the plane. Say the total surface area of J20 is 110-120 and F22 is 100. Doesn't matter how hard the engineers try to reduce RCS, J20 can still only achieve to being close to F22's level (very hard to surpass it), because it starts with a very large area. It's like making a fat man compete with a 170 pounder to diet to reach 150 pounds, obviously the skinny one will win. He doesn't have to lose that much in the first place.
I agree with the broader thrust of your arguments, but I do think that once we get to the point about how much surface area is facing a radar from the bottom view we should leave that to an actual measurement of surface area. Normally I would simply point out that while the J-20 has canards adding to area facing a land radar from the bottom, the F-22 has tail planes. Nonetheless you're right. All else held equal, it's the actual surface area that matters.
 

kyuryu

Junior Member
I agree with the broader thrust of your arguments, but I do think that once we get to the point about how much surface area is facing a radar from the bottom view we should leave that to an actual measurement of surface area. Normally I would simply point out that while the J-20 has canards adding to area facing a land radar from the bottom, the F-22 has tail planes. Nonetheless you're right. All else held equal, it's the actual surface area that matters.

I think it's important to maintain perspective that the J-20 and J-31 represent a quantum jump in capability.

We could spend hours debating the relative strengths and/or weakness of the J-20/J-31 vs x,y,z platform and their respective degrees of stealthiness. The premise has been that the F-22A would pick-off 4th Gen fighters via BVR engagement before they had even been detected, working in concert with it's own 4th Gen platforms. This presupposes that the other side is using 4 Gen platforms, but with the introduction of the J-20/J-31 suddenly the tables have turned.

China, will soon be able to similarly field aircraft that can similarly dominate BVR combat, especially, if a metor type AAM, is fielded in the next 5 yrs, complicating the deployment of ISR, air refueling, C4I. The fact that the F-22 x% more or less stealthy kinda misses the point and the strategic shift that these systems have brought to the balance of power in the region.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
I think it's important to maintain perspective that the J-20 and J-31 represent a quantum jump in capability.

We could spend hours debating the relative strengths and/or weakness of the J-20/J-31 vs x,y,z platform and their respective degrees of stealthiness. The premise has been that the F-22A would pick-off 4th Gen fighters via BVR engagement before they had even been detected, working in concert with it's own 4th Gen platforms. This presupposes that the other side is using 4 Gen platforms, but with the introduction of the J-20/J-31 suddenly the tables have turned.

China, will soon be able to similarly field aircraft that can similarly dominate BVR combat, especially, if a metor type AAM, is fielded in the next 5 yrs, complicating the deployment of ISR, air refueling, C4I. The fact that the F-22 x% more or less stealthy kinda misses the point and the strategic shift that these systems have brought to the balance of power in the region.

Absolutely, and at the end of the day that is what matters most. However, getting a measurement of how stealthy or maneuverable one platform is to another gives us an interesting look into just how well they might compete. If the designs are expected to be pitted against one another in an air war, at some point we should expect the two designs to face off (one imagined war scenario being either the J-20 being the aggressor and the F-22 playing interdictor, or vice versa). That's where the relevance of comparison comes in, but it's also where we encounter the heuristic pitfalls to measuring performance. The truth is we can attempt to extrapolate from piecemeal information, but we simply do not know. That won't keep people from wanting to try though.
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Sorry guys but regarding any news in this "Shenyang J-31 tread" why are again so long discussions about aerodynamics & TVC, :mad: ??? ... please continue this in the Aerodynamics tread and leave this one for the J-31-related stuff.

Deino
 

delft

Brigadier
The result of a rich mixture gentlemen, we here in the OLDE country used to call the military high speed low altitude routes "Oil Burner Routes", as our airstrip was right under the Howard MOA here in central Illinois, low flying smoking F-4s would usually fly over as two ship, often doing the scissors manuever, to see who could get the drop on whom? They were often followed minutes later by another two ship of smokers, I just love it. Then the F-16s replaced the F-4s and they burned a lot cleaner and were much quieter as they approaced, but once past your could hear the air being ripped to shreds by those F-100s powering the F-16. I lived in dread of looking up at the last minute and realizing I was about to be a bug on the front of an f-16. but honestly vini was already on this one! Brat
OT
Nearly fifty years ago I was walking at Schiphol when a BAC 1-11 ( two Spey engines ) flew over me to land a few hundred meters away and a minute later I experienced the horrible smell of those engines.
 
Last edited:

escobar

Brigadier
AVIC boss, Zuoming LIN (second guy from the right) in SAC 112th Factory. He was there for the maiden flight.
Notice the badges...

KT9cX_zps5c454485.jpg
 

ladioussupp

Junior Member
AVIC boss, Zuoming LIN (second guy from the right) in SAC 112th Factory. He was there for the maiden flight.
Notice the badges...

What are those things in front of people? Why do those on the rails have "ventilation fans"? Are those models or something else?
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
What are those things in front of people? Why do those on the rails have "ventilation fans"? Are those models or something else?

They look like Computer Controlled production machinery to me:
My guess would be either polishing machines or possibly (given the variety in the forms of the heads) a machine for applying complex laminates or other coatings .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top