As standalone structures? No worse or even lower in measurement. But that is not how total RCS is calculated: Sums the discrete measured figures.
The interaction between discrete structures is what made the corner reflector undesirable in RCS control. This make location, location, and location, just like real estate sales, crucial for RCS control. Corner reflectors are fixed and this make them predictable in terms of level of contributorship. Moving structures are less predictable. Put both fixed and moving structures on a moving complex body and we have internal weapons bays, absorber on leading edges, and other methods in trying to minimize returns to source direction. That is why we have to measure the entire aircraft despite the fact that we have binders full of discrete standalone measurements of individual structures, large and small........
Note what the comment said about maneuver restrictions in combat. Even as minimalist a design like the flying wing B-2, target scintillations because of low level radiation generators, like the split wing tip rudders to create asymmetric drag for turning, are sufficient to discourage its usage.
Currently use 2x RD-93 aircraft engines,also used by JF-17 fighter
You could just build the canards out of radar transparent materials (the same thing you build the nosecone with) to get around the RCS problem, or at least mitigate it significantly (you can't do the same to the rest of the fuselage, because unlike the canards, they have inside things like the pilot, fuel tanks and engines which definitely have very large RCS readings).
Of course, those composites might not be very sturdy, so the PLAAF would probably have to swap out the canards constantly if that's the case.
Montgomery asked if China was angry at the British, Mao said no, not any more. Henceforth, they were friends, and exchanged gifts. Not sure what China gave (I presume leaving HK free from revolution and in British hands for the time being), but the Brits gave the jet engine, and support for China in becoming a member of the UN security council.
That's a politic and from Mao. Chinese people have a very very long memory, most still remember (not angry) what the British had done in the past. What the British had done in the past to China was really very bad, I can't imagine how would all Chinese would forgive the British.
one of many very bad events by the British
Well, their envoys were imprisoned and tortured. You can't really expect them not to take punitive action, especially considering the unequal strategic position between the Qing and British empires. Now the forced importation of Opium into China.... that's another concern entirely.
Personally I see this all as water under the bridge; to me the Ming and Qing empires represent the nadir of Chinese history, and the humiliation comes as much from the inability for social, political and economic change to come about for over 200 years (simply compare Qing to the Meiji Restoration), as from the treatment by foreign powers.