I think 370mm is in close to ~ 300km range.PHL-16 130km with 300mm
370mm has 220km range
This dude is a fanboy, dont trust his babbling
I think 370mm is in close to ~ 300km range.PHL-16 130km with 300mm
370mm has 220km range
This dude is a fanboy, dont trust his babbling
They also talked about the need for PCL191 to have all terrain capabilities, since China can't just build roads to places where they want to launch from.
Diameter increase volume too isnt it?In fact , do the ranges of rocket artilleries exclusively depend on their diameter ?? Can't increase in length (additional boosters) help in this matter ??
This is a quite complex topic. In general, if we are taking the trajectory as a constant variable to equalize things it mostly depends on burnout velocity and altitude. Burnout velocity is (isp x (ln(fueled mass/final mass)) - (gravity losses + aerodynamic loses). Thus it is about fuel fraction and the propellant. Denser and more efficient propellants are better. Staging helps massively because it allows you to shed empty fuel tanks as you burn fuel saving you from wasting fuel to further accelerate them. Composite bodies, lower payloads, lighter mechanisms and electronics, and ceramic nozzles all help in reducing non-fuel mass. Aerodynamics is of secondary importance since the rocket goes very high but is still important. Increasing the length would increase the ratio of fueled mass/final mass and thus would increase the range. There are limitations to it such as body stiffness and, in larger rockets, thrust-to-weight ratio but is definitely good for range in most cases.In fact , do the ranges of rocket artilleries exclusively depend on their diameter ?? Can't increase in length (additional boosters) help in this matter ??
How can a 300mm or close to 300mm diameter rocket artillery reach 500 Km ??