SD Forum suggestions and questions
- Thread starter Ryz05
- Start date
- Status
Ok, I just got that idea from china history forum. I was a little confused about how to activate the quick reply box at first, but figured it out after noticing the arrow activation button.
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Sinodefence.com Suggestions
The vertical landing/takeoff UAV (VT-UAV) directs to the same page as the ASN-206 Also, ASN-105 directs to the same page as ASN-104. I'm not sure if you want to combine the two titles in the table page or leave them separate.
The vertical landing/takeoff UAV (VT-UAV) directs to the same page as the ASN-206 Also, ASN-105 directs to the same page as ASN-104. I'm not sure if you want to combine the two titles in the table page or leave them separate.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 675
Guest
Re: Sinodefence.com Suggestions
This might sound trivial, but I think the headers at the top of the site could to with being tweaked.
"Naval ships"? Sounds a bit Chingrish-y to me. Plus as one refers to subs as "boats", ships doesn't seem appropriate as an overall header to me.
How about just "Navy"? Indeed, why not just change the first three to "Airforce", "Navy" and "Ground Forces"? Well, whatever you do I just think "Naval ships" doesn't sound right.
This might sound trivial, but I think the headers at the top of the site could to with being tweaked.
"Naval ships"? Sounds a bit Chingrish-y to me. Plus as one refers to subs as "boats", ships doesn't seem appropriate as an overall header to me.
How about just "Navy"? Indeed, why not just change the first three to "Airforce", "Navy" and "Ground Forces"? Well, whatever you do I just think "Naval ships" doesn't sound right.
Re: Sinodefence.com Suggestions
The reason that I don't use 'Navy' to refer to this section any more is because this section is not about navy as an organisation, but the 'ships' that serve with the navy.
I did do some search on Internet and found similar use:
An alternative option is 'Warships' but it sounds kind of amateur.
or maybe 'naval vessels'?
Any suggestions anyone?
The reason that I don't use 'Navy' to refer to this section any more is because this section is not about navy as an organisation, but the 'ships' that serve with the navy.
I did do some search on Internet and found similar use:
An alternative option is 'Warships' but it sounds kind of amateur.
or maybe 'naval vessels'?
Any suggestions anyone?
Last edited:
Re: Sinodefence.com Suggestions
I don't mind it being "Naval Ships." The word, "Ships", goes well with other titles like "Amphibious Warfare Ships" or "Littorial Warfare Ships". You can always leave a message on Wikipedia discussion page asking about the right title for the wiki-article. "Naval vessels" also sounds fine, but "warships" isn't right, because you have fleet support ships listed, and those are not warships.
I don't mind it being "Naval Ships." The word, "Ships", goes well with other titles like "Amphibious Warfare Ships" or "Littorial Warfare Ships". You can always leave a message on Wikipedia discussion page asking about the right title for the wiki-article. "Naval vessels" also sounds fine, but "warships" isn't right, because you have fleet support ships listed, and those are not warships.
- Status