Russian Su-57 Aircraft Thread (PAK-FA and IAF FGFA)

Hyperwarp

Captain
Pic time!

#511
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

240466.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

239220.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

239637.jpg


#510
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

239689.jpg
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
There are a lot of people who think the Russians or Sukhoi are idiots. I have always said for people to wait until the actual production version is in service before they pass judgement on the aircraft. Just look at the Su-27 prototypes and the actual mass production version. It is like a totally different aircraft. Did they expect this process to be any different? The first prototypes were to test the flight control laws. Not to have maximum stealth. Supposedly the aircraft also lacked strength in the internal airframe, they found it during flight tests, and had to be redesigned. Until I see the mass production version, with the Izdeliye 30 engine, I will not pass judgement on the quality of the aircraft.

For example, it might be that the frontal RCS will be reduced not just with mesh screens, but also with composite materials in the cold section, i.e. frontal, fan blades in the newer engine. Until we see the final version in service there is no way to properly estimate the RCS.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

As observed previously, the Russian approach to development follows an “evolutionary” design philosophy, in which risks are retired early in the development phase of a new aircraft type or variant. Where possible, the retirement of risks is achieved in earlier programs, as demonstrated repeatedly in the development of the T-10 Flanker series of aircraft.

The PAK-FA prototypes displayed in January, 2010, are clearly intended to validate the compatibility of the overall observables shaping with the aerodynamic and structural design needs and clearly so, as the expensive detail RCS flare spot treatments we are accustomed to seeing on US prototypes are absent. The rationale for this is simple - why expend valuable but scarce development resources if aerodynamic / structural load testing shows that major changes are required to shaping of important design elements? For Western contractors, where the imperative is to extract the maximum of development funding from the customer, and make early cancellation of a program difficult, the highest risk approach will nearly always be sought by senior management. An excellent case study of the latter is the extremely high level of “concurrency risk”, reported by the General Accounting Office, in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Sneaky - #053 is actually wearing more than one Okhotnik silhouette:

View attachment 50852

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


What with all the unique blade aerials and chin fairing it may well be functioning more as an Okhotnik test bed than a Su-57 prototype at this point!

The digital coloration on the belly of the plane looks like a stealthy drone/bomber.
 
Top