It's clear as day to anyone with comprehension skills and ISN'T biased, that Jeff in this post WAS indeed referring to China as one of the "potentially aggressor nations' aircraft carriers" which the countries buying F-35B is aiming to counter. What is so hard to get about this simple point. I'm not talking about anything else literally. Just that this exists and using the word aggressor is also indeed a reflection of personal political position which is also FINE. But it's also okay to point that out.
Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
- Thread starter tphuang
- Start date
D
Deleted member 13312
Guest
That's really only clear to someone who is thinks that Russia and China are so self important as to warrant immediately allegation and I notice how you conveniently left out Iran when you referred to "aircraft carriers" because Iran does not have any, yet the F-35B is the one that is supposed to counter that ?
It's interesting to see how you methodically shift from the F-35 to the F-35B, while it is true that Jeff focused mostly on the F-35B the main gist of his post is focused on the fact that nations bought the F-35 because of it's perceived value. That is something that you or Anthv has insofar fail to point out.
It's interesting to see how you methodically shift from the F-35 to the F-35B, while it is true that Jeff focused mostly on the F-35B the main gist of his post is focused on the fact that nations bought the F-35 because of it's perceived value. That is something that you or Anthv has insofar fail to point out.
lol pathetic. Why have you moved to putting words into Jeff's mouth now?
Again my posts speak for themselves. You said you couldn't find something, I help you out. A thanks isn't expected from you but distracting and making a whole bunch of irrelevant noise and making a whole bunch of accusations against a person uninvolved with this discussion is beyond pathetic. Sad really.
The only thing I've pointed out is your none-attempt or inability to find a certain word that WAS used as opposed to your "meh meh wah wah I can't find where that was said" post and I used F-35B because that's what Jeff was writing about. Have you noticed I was not involved in this discussion so no there is no me and anthl. Just antl and Jeff and your hopeless comprehension skills.
Again my posts speak for themselves. You said you couldn't find something, I help you out. A thanks isn't expected from you but distracting and making a whole bunch of irrelevant noise and making a whole bunch of accusations against a person uninvolved with this discussion is beyond pathetic. Sad really.
The only thing I've pointed out is your none-attempt or inability to find a certain word that WAS used as opposed to your "meh meh wah wah I can't find where that was said" post and I used F-35B because that's what Jeff was writing about. Have you noticed I was not involved in this discussion so no there is no me and anthl. Just antl and Jeff and your hopeless comprehension skills.
D
Deleted member 13312
Guest
Nice way to sugar coat a bare attempt of cherry picking placing assumptions as facts where there aren't any.
lol way to go covering your failure to find the facts of this discussion. You claimed you could not find the "aggressor" description and now you try muddle it up. Well YOU said you couldn't find it anywhere and I pointed out where. A thanks would be nice but well above what you are able to offer.
D
Deleted member 13312
Guest
No what you brought up are words which existed nowhere in Jeff's post and are based on your assumptions.
Jura The idiot
General
Feb 11, 2017
well now ТАСС said had fired one "Zircon" during a test in January of this year:
No relationship with reality whatsoever.
Jura The idiot
General
Mar 1, 2018
and it seems it's passed state (government) tests recently: (the name of a torp is not given in the press-relase )
